TY  - JOUR
AU  - Yamanaka, Syunsuke
AU  - Goto, Tadahiro
AU  - Morikawa, Koji
AU  - Watase, Hiroko
AU  - Okamoto, Hiroshi
AU  - Hagiwara, Yusuke
AU  - Hasegawa, Kohei
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/1/25
TI  - Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Difficult Airway and First-Pass Success in the Emergency Department: Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
JO  - Interact J Med Res
SP  - e28366
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
KW  - intubation
KW  - machine learning
KW  - difficult airway
KW  - first-pass success
AB  - Background: There is still room for improvement in the modified LEMON (look, evaluate, Mallampati, obstruction, neck mobility) criteria for difficult airway prediction and no prediction tool for first-pass success in the emergency department (ED). Objective: We applied modern machine learning approaches to predict difficult airways and first-pass success. Methods: In a multicenter prospective study that enrolled consecutive patients who underwent tracheal intubation in 13 EDs, we developed 7 machine learning models (eg, random forest model) using routinely collected data (eg, demographics, initial airway assessment). The outcomes were difficult airway and first-pass success. Model performance was evaluated using c-statistics, calibration slopes, and association measures (eg, sensitivity) in the test set (randomly selected 20% of the data). Their performance was compared with the modified LEMON criteria for difficult airway success and a logistic regression model for first-pass success. Results: Of 10,741 patients who underwent intubation, 543 patients (5.1%) had a difficult airway, and 7690 patients (71.6%) had first-pass success. In predicting a difficult airway, machine learning models—except for k-point nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron—had higher discrimination ability than the modified LEMON criteria (all, P≤.001). For example, the ensemble method had the highest c-statistic (0.74 vs 0.62 with the modified LEMON criteria; P<.001). Machine learning models—except k-point nearest neighbor and random forest models—had higher discrimination ability for first-pass success. In particular, the ensemble model had the highest c-statistic (0.81 vs 0.76 with the reference regression; P<.001). Conclusions: Machine learning models demonstrated greater ability for predicting difficult airway and first-pass success in the ED. 
SN  - 1929-073X
UR  - https://www.i-jmr.org/2022/1/e28366
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/28366
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35076398
DO  - 10.2196/28366
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/28366
ER  -