TY - JOUR AU - Sebo, Paul AU - Tudrej, Benoit AU - Bernard, Augustin AU - Delaunay, Bruno AU - Dupuy, Alexandra AU - Malavergne, Claire AU - Maisonneuve, Hubert PY - 2025/2/25 TI - Increasing Participation and Completion Rates in Questionnaire Surveys of Primary Care Patients: Cluster-Randomized Study JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e67981 VL - 14 KW - completion rate KW - missing data KW - mixed mode KW - web-based KW - participation rate KW - primary care KW - questionnaire KW - QR code KW - tablet KW - survey KW - primary care patients KW - randomized study N2 - Background: Participation and completion rates in questionnaire-based surveys are often low. Objective: This study aims to assess participation and completion rates for a survey using paper and mixed mode questionnaires with patients recruited by research assistants in primary care waiting rooms. Methods: This cluster-randomized study, conducted in 2023 in France, involved 974 patients from 39 practices randomized into 4 groups: ?paper with incentive? (n=251), ?paper without incentive? (n=368), ?mixed mode with tablet? (n=187), and ?mixed mode with QR code? (n=168). Analyses compared the combined paper group with the 2 mixed mode groups and the ?paper with incentive? and ?paper without incentive? groups. Logistic regressions were used to analyze participation and completion rates. Results: Of the 974 patients recruited, 822 (women: 536/821, 65.3%; median age 52, IQR 37-68 years) agreed to participate (participation rate=84.4%), with no significant differences between groups. Overall, 806 patients (98.1%) answered all 48 questions. Completion rates were highest in the combined paper group (99.8%) compared to mixed mode groups (96.8% for paper or tablet, 93.3% for paper or QR code; P<.001). There was no significant difference in completion rates between the ?paper with incentive? and ?paper without incentive? groups (100% vs 99.7%). Conclusions: Recruiting patients in waiting rooms with research assistants resulted in high participation and completion rates across all groups. Mixed mode options did not enhance participation or completion rates but may offer logistical advantages. Future research should explore incentives and mixed-mode strategies in diverse settings. UR - https://www.i-jmr.org/2025/1/e67981 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/67981 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ID - info:doi/10.2196/67981 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kumar, Naresh AU - Hui, Jian Si AU - Lee, Renick AU - Athia, Sahil AU - Tan, Hao Joel Yong AU - Tan, Hao Jonathan Jiong PY - 2025/1/17 TI - Evaluation of the Feasibility of Transfusing Leukocyte Depletion Filter?Processed Intraoperative Cell Salvage Blood in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: Protocol for a Non?Randomized Study JO - JMIR Res Protoc SP - e54609 VL - 14 KW - blood transfusion KW - autologous blood transfusion KW - operative blood salvage KW - leukocyte reduction filtration KW - intraoperative blood cell salvage KW - extramedullary spinal cord compression KW - metastases KW - tumors KW - leukocytes N2 - Background: Metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) is often complex and extensive leading to significant blood loss. Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) is the mainstay of blood replenishment but with immune-mediated postoperative complications. Alternative blood management techniques (salvaged blood transfusion [SBT]) allow us to overcome such complications. Despite widespread use of intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) in oncological and nononcological surgical procedures, surgeons remain reluctant to use IOCS in MSTS. Objective: This study aims to analyze safety of IOCS-leukocyte depletion filter (LDF)?processed blood transfusion for patients undergoing MSTS by assessing clinical outcomes?disease progression: tumor progression and overall survival. This study evaluates whether reinfusion of IOCS-LDF?processed blood reduces ABT rates in patients undergoing MSTS by sorting patients undergoing MSTS who require ABT into patients who consent to receive or not receive SBT. Methods: We aim to recruit a minimum of 90 patients?30 patients for SBT, 30 patients for ABT, and 30 patients with no blood transfusion. SBT and ABT form the 2 experimental arms, whereas no blood transfusion forms the control cohort. Available patient data will be reviewed to determine tumor burden secondary to metastasis and postoperative survival and disease progression, improvement in pain, and neurological and ambulatory status. Data collected will be studied postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months or until demise, whichever occurs first. Outcomes of the experimental groups will be compared with those of the control group. Outcomes will be analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Fisher exact test. The Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test will be used to study overall survival. A multivariate and competing risk analysis will be used to study the association between blood transfusion type and tumor progression. All statistical analyses will be done using Stata Special Edition 14.0 (StataCorp LP). Results: This is the largest clinical study on use of IOCS in MSTS from various primary malignancies to date. It will provide significant clinical evidence regarding the safety and applicability of IOCS in MSTS. It will help reduce use of ABT, improving overall blood management of patients undergoing MSTS. A limitation of this study is that not all patients undergoing MSTS will survive for the follow-up period (4 years), theoretically leading to underreporting of disease progression. Study commenced in 2016 and patient recruitment continued till 2019. As of September 2019, we have collected operative data on 140 patients. However, the 2-year outcomes of about 40.0% (56/140) of patients are in the process of collection. The study is aimed to be published in the years 2023-2024. Conclusions: Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, paving the way for future studies. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54609 UR - https://www.researchprotocols.org/2025/1/e54609 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/54609 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ID - info:doi/10.2196/54609 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Atchison, J. Christina AU - Gilby, Nicholas AU - Pantelidou, Galini AU - Clemens, Sam AU - Pickering, Kevin AU - Chadeau-Hyam, Marc AU - Ashby, Deborah AU - Barclay, S. Wendy AU - Cooke, S. Graham AU - Darzi, Ara AU - Riley, Steven AU - Donnelly, A. Christl AU - Ward, Helen AU - Elliott, Paul PY - 2025/1/9 TI - Strategies to Increase Response Rate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias in Population Health Research: Analysis of a Series of Randomized Controlled Experiments during a Large COVID-19 Study JO - JMIR Public Health Surveill SP - e60022 VL - 11 KW - study recruitment KW - response rate KW - population-based research KW - COVID-19 KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - web-based questionnaires N2 - Background: High response rates are needed in population-based studies, as nonresponse reduces effective sample size and bias affects accuracy and decreases the generalizability of the study findings. Objective: We tested different strategies to improve response rate and reduce nonresponse bias in a national population?based COVID-19 surveillance program in England, United Kingdom. Methods: Over 19 rounds, a random sample of individuals aged 5 years and older from the general population in England were invited by mail to complete a web-based questionnaire and return a swab for SARS-CoV-2 testing. We carried out several nested randomized controlled experiments to measure the impact on response rates of different interventions, including (1) variations in invitation and reminder letters and SMS text messages and (2) the offer of a conditional monetary incentive to return a swab, reporting absolute changes in response and relative response rate (95% CIs). Results: Monetary incentives increased the response rate (completed swabs returned as a proportion of the number of individuals invited) across all age groups, sex at birth, and area deprivation with the biggest increase among the lowest responders, namely teenagers and young adults and those living in more deprived areas. With no monetary incentive, the response rate was 3.4% in participants aged 18?22 years, increasing to 8.1% with a £10 (US $12.5) incentive, 11.9% with £20 (US $25.0), and 18.2% with £30 (US $37.5) (relative response rate 2.4 [95% CI 2.0-2.9], 3.5 [95% CI 3.0-4.2], and 5.4 [95% CI 4.4-6.7], respectively). Nonmonetary strategies had a modest, if any, impact on response rate. The largest effect was observed for sending an additional swab reminder (SMS text message or email). For example, those receiving an additional SMS text message were more likely to return a completed swab compared to those receiving the standard email-SMS approach, 73.3% versus 70.2%: percentage difference 3.1% (95% CI 2.2%-4.0%). Conclusions: Conditional monetary incentives improved response rates to a web-based survey, which required the return of a swab test, particularly for younger age groups. Used in a selective way, incentives may be an effective strategy for improving sample response and representativeness in population-based studies. UR - https://publichealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e60022 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/60022 ID - info:doi/10.2196/60022 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Silvey, Scott AU - Liu, Jinze PY - 2024/12/17 TI - Sample Size Requirements for Popular Classification Algorithms in Tabular Clinical Data: Empirical Study JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e60231 VL - 26 KW - medical informatics KW - machine learning KW - sample size KW - research design KW - decision trees KW - classification algorithm KW - clinical research KW - learning-curve analysis KW - analysis KW - analyses KW - guidelines KW - ML KW - decision making KW - algorithm KW - curve analysis KW - dataset N2 - Background: The performance of a classification algorithm eventually reaches a point of diminishing returns, where the additional sample added does not improve the results. Thus, there is a need to determine an optimal sample size that maximizes performance while accounting for computational burden or budgetary concerns. Objective: This study aimed to determine optimal sample sizes and the relationships between sample size and dataset-level characteristics over a variety of binary classification algorithms. Methods: A total of 16 large open-source datasets were collected, each containing a binary clinical outcome. Furthermore, 4 machine learning algorithms were assessed: XGBoost (XGB), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and neural networks (NNs). For each dataset, the cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) was calculated at increasing sample sizes, and learning curves were fit. Sample sizes needed to reach the observed full?dataset AUC minus 2 points (0.02) were calculated from the fitted learning curves and compared across the datasets and algorithms. Dataset?level characteristics, minority class proportion, full?dataset AUC, number of features, type of features, and degree of nonlinearity were examined. Negative binomial regression models were used to quantify relationships between these characteristics and expected sample sizes within each algorithm. A total of 4 multivariable models were constructed, which selected the best-fitting combination of dataset?level characteristics. Results: Among the 16 datasets (full-dataset sample sizes ranging from 70,000-1,000,000), median sample sizes were 9960 (XGB), 3404 (RF), 696 (LR), and 12,298 (NN) to reach AUC stability. For all 4 algorithms, more balanced classes (multiplier: 0.93-0.96 for a 1% increase in minority class proportion) were associated with decreased sample size. Other characteristics varied in importance across algorithms?in general, more features, weaker features, and more complex relationships between the predictors and the response increased expected sample sizes. In multivariable analysis, the top selected predictors were minority class proportion among all 4 algorithms assessed, full?dataset AUC (XGB, RF, and NN), and dataset nonlinearity (XGB, RF, and NN). For LR, the top predictors were minority class proportion, percentage of strong linear features, and number of features. Final multivariable sample size models had high goodness-of-fit, with dataset?level predictors explaining a majority (66.5%-84.5%) of the total deviance in the data among all 4 models. Conclusions: The sample sizes needed to reach AUC stability among 4 popular classification algorithms vary by dataset and method and are associated with dataset?level characteristics that can be influenced or estimated before the start of a research study. UR - https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e60231 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/60231 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ID - info:doi/10.2196/60231 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Camirand Lemyre, Félix AU - Lévesque, Simon AU - Domingue, Marie-Pier AU - Herrmann, Klaus AU - Ethier, Jean-François PY - 2024/11/14 TI - Distributed Statistical Analyses: A Scoping Review and Examples of Operational Frameworks Adapted to Health Analytics JO - JMIR Med Inform SP - e53622 VL - 12 KW - distributed algorithms KW - generalized linear models KW - horizontally partitioned data KW - GLMs KW - learning health systems KW - distributed analysis KW - federated analysis KW - data science KW - data custodians KW - algorithms KW - statistics KW - synthesis KW - review methods KW - searches KW - scoping N2 - Background: Data from multiple organizations are crucial for advancing learning health systems. However, ethical, legal, and social concerns may restrict the use of standard statistical methods that rely on pooling data. Although distributed algorithms offer alternatives, they may not always be suitable for health frameworks. Objective: This study aims to support researchers and data custodians in three ways: (1) providing a concise overview of the literature on statistical inference methods for horizontally partitioned data, (2) describing the methods applicable to generalized linear models (GLMs) and assessing their underlying distributional assumptions, and (3) adapting existing methods to make them fully usable in health settings. Methods: A scoping review methodology was used for the literature mapping, from which methods presenting a methodological framework for GLM analyses with horizontally partitioned data were identified and assessed from the perspective of applicability in health settings. Statistical theory was used to adapt methods and derive the properties of the resulting estimators. Results: From the review, 41 articles were selected and 6 approaches were extracted to conduct standard GLM-based statistical analysis. However, these approaches assumed evenly and identically distributed data across nodes. Consequently, statistical procedures were derived to accommodate uneven node sample sizes and heterogeneous data distributions across nodes. Workflows and detailed algorithms were developed to highlight information sharing requirements and operational complexity. Conclusions: This study contributes to the field of health analytics by providing an overview of the methods that can be used with horizontally partitioned data by adapting these methods to the context of heterogeneous health data and clarifying the workflows and quantities exchanged by the methods discussed. Further analysis of the confidentiality preserved by these methods is needed to fully understand the risk associated with the sharing of summary statistics. UR - https://medinform.jmir.org/2024/1/e53622 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/53622 ID - info:doi/10.2196/53622 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Calderon Ramirez, Lucrecia Claudia AU - Farmer, Yanick AU - Downar, James AU - Frolic, Andrea AU - Opatrny, Lucie AU - Poirier, Diane AU - Bravo, Gina AU - L'Espérance, Audrey AU - Gaucher, Nathalie AU - Payot, Antoine AU - Dahine, Joseph AU - Tanuseputro, Peter AU - Rousseau, Louis-Martin AU - Dumez, Vincent AU - Descôteaux, Annie AU - Dallaire, Clara AU - Laporte, Karell AU - Bouthillier, Marie-Eve PY - 2024/11/11 TI - Assessing the Quality of an Online Democratic Deliberation on COVID-19 Pandemic Triage Protocols for Access to Critical Care in an Extreme Pandemic Context: Mixed Methods Study JO - J Particip Med SP - e54841 VL - 16 KW - quality assessment KW - online democratic deliberation KW - COVID-19 triage or prioritization KW - critical care KW - clinical ethics N2 - Background: Online democratic deliberation (ODD) may foster public engagement in new health strategies by providing opportunities for knowledge exchange between experts, policy makers, and the public. It can favor decision-making by generating new points of view and solutions to existing problems. Deliberation experts recommend gathering feedback from participants to optimize future implementation. However, this online modality has not been frequently evaluated. Objective: This study aims to (1) assess the quality of an ODD held in Quebec and Ontario, Canada, on the topic of COVID-19 triage protocols for access to critical care in an extreme pandemic context and (2) determine its transformative aspect according to the perceptions of participants. Methods: We conducted a simultaneous ODD in Quebec and Ontario on May 28 and June 4, 2022, with a diversified target audience not working in the health care system. We used a thematic analysis for the transcripts of the deliberation and the written comments of the participants related to the quality of the process. Participants responded to a postdeliberation questionnaire to assess the quality of the ODD and identify changes in their perspectives on COVID-19 pandemic triage protocols after the deliberation exercise. Descriptive statistics were used. An index was calculated to determine equality of participation. Results: The ODD involved 47 diverse participants from the public (n=20, 43% from Quebec and n=27, 57% from Ontario). Five themes emerged: (1) process appreciation, (2) learning experience, (3) reflecting on the common good, (4) technological aspects, and (5) transformative aspects. A total of 46 participants responded to the questionnaire. Participants considered the quality of the ODD satisfactory in terms of process, information shared, reasoning, and videoconferencing. A total of 4 (80%) of 5 participants reported at least 1 change of perspective on some of the criteria and values discussed. Most participants reported that the online modality was accessible and user-friendly. We found low polarization when calculating equal participation. Improvements identified were measures to replace participants when unable to connect and optimization of time during discussions. Conclusions: Overall, the participants perceived the quality of ODD as satisfactory. Some participants self-reported a change of opinion after deliberation. The online modality may be an acceptable alternative for democratic deliberation but with some organizational adaptations. UR - https://jopm.jmir.org/2024/1/e54841 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/54841 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ID - info:doi/10.2196/54841 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Mollalo, Abolfazl AU - Hamidi, Bashir AU - Lenert, A. Leslie AU - Alekseyenko, V. Alexander PY - 2024/10/15 TI - Application of Spatial Analysis on Electronic Health Records to Characterize Patient Phenotypes: Systematic Review JO - JMIR Med Inform SP - e56343 VL - 12 KW - clinical phenotypes KW - electronic health records KW - geocoding KW - geographic information systems KW - patient phenotypes KW - spatial analysis N2 - Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) commonly contain patient addresses that provide valuable data for geocoding and spatial analysis, enabling more comprehensive descriptions of individual patients for clinical purposes. Despite the widespread use of EHRs in clinical decision support and interventions, no systematic review has examined the extent to which spatial analysis is used to characterize patient phenotypes. Objective: This study reviews advanced spatial analyses that used individual-level health data from EHRs within the United States to characterize patient phenotypes. Methods: We systematically evaluated English-language, peer-reviewed studies from the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from inception to August 20, 2023, without imposing constraints on study design or specific health domains. Results: A substantial proportion of studies (>85%) were limited to geocoding or basic mapping without implementing advanced spatial statistical analysis, leaving only 49 studies that met the eligibility criteria. These studies used diverse spatial methods, with a predominant focus on clustering techniques, while spatiotemporal analysis (frequentist and Bayesian) and modeling were less common. A noteworthy surge (n=42, 86%) in publications was observed after 2017. The publications investigated a variety of adult and pediatric clinical areas, including infectious disease, endocrinology, and cardiology, using phenotypes defined over a range of data domains such as demographics, diagnoses, and visits. The primary health outcomes investigated were asthma, hypertension, and diabetes. Notably, patient phenotypes involving genomics, imaging, and notes were limited. Conclusions: This review underscores the growing interest in spatial analysis of EHR-derived data and highlights knowledge gaps in clinical health, phenotype domains, and spatial methodologies. We suggest that future research should focus on addressing these gaps and harnessing spatial analysis to enhance individual patient contexts and clinical decision support. UR - https://medinform.jmir.org/2024/1/e56343 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/56343 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ID - info:doi/10.2196/56343 ER - TY - JOUR AU - González-Castro, Ana AU - Leirós-Rodríguez, Raquel AU - Prada-García, Camino AU - Benítez-Andrades, Alberto José PY - 2024/4/29 TI - The Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Fall Risk: Systematic Review JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e54934 VL - 26 KW - machine learning KW - accidental falls KW - public health KW - patient care KW - artificial intelligence KW - AI KW - fall risk N2 - Background: Falls and their consequences are a serious public health problem worldwide. Each year, 37.3 million falls requiring medical attention occur. Therefore, the analysis of fall risk is of great importance for prevention. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents an innovative tool for creating predictive statistical models of fall risk through data analysis. Objective: The aim of this review was to analyze the available evidence on the applications of AI in the analysis of data related to postural control and fall risk. Methods: A literature search was conducted in 6 databases with the following inclusion criteria: the articles had to be published within the last 5 years (from 2018 to 2024), they had to apply some method of AI, AI analyses had to be applied to data from samples consisting of humans, and the analyzed sample had to consist of individuals with independent walking with or without the assistance of external orthopedic devices. Results: We obtained a total of 3858 articles, of which 22 were finally selected. Data extraction for subsequent analysis varied in the different studies: 82% (18/22) of them extracted data through tests or functional assessments, and the remaining 18% (4/22) of them extracted through existing medical records. Different AI techniques were used throughout the articles. All the research included in the review obtained accuracy values of >70% in the predictive models obtained through AI. Conclusions: The use of AI proves to be a valuable tool for creating predictive models of fall risk. The use of this tool could have a significant socioeconomic impact as it enables the development of low-cost predictive models with a high level of accuracy. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023443277; https://tinyurl.com/4sb72ssv UR - https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e54934 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/54934 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38684088 ID - info:doi/10.2196/54934 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Sallam, Malik AU - Barakat, Muna AU - Sallam, Mohammed PY - 2024/2/15 TI - A Preliminary Checklist (METRICS) to Standardize the Design and Reporting of Studies on Generative Artificial Intelligence?Based Models in Health Care Education and Practice: Development Study Involving a Literature Review JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e54704 VL - 13 KW - guidelines KW - evaluation KW - meaningful analytics KW - large language models KW - decision support N2 - Background: Adherence to evidence-based practice is indispensable in health care. Recently, the utility of generative artificial intelligence (AI) models in health care has been evaluated extensively. However, the lack of consensus guidelines on the design and reporting of findings of these studies poses a challenge for the interpretation and synthesis of evidence. Objective: This study aimed to develop a preliminary checklist to standardize the reporting of generative AI-based studies in health care education and practice. Methods: A literature review was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Published records with ?ChatGPT,? ?Bing,? or ?Bard? in the title were retrieved. Careful examination of the methodologies employed in the included records was conducted to identify the common pertinent themes and the possible gaps in reporting. A panel discussion was held to establish a unified and thorough checklist for the reporting of AI studies in health care. The finalized checklist was used to evaluate the included records by 2 independent raters. Cohen ? was used as the method to evaluate the interrater reliability. Results: The final data set that formed the basis for pertinent theme identification and analysis comprised a total of 34 records. The finalized checklist included 9 pertinent themes collectively referred to as METRICS (Model, Evaluation, Timing, Range/Randomization, Individual factors, Count, and Specificity of prompts and language). Their details are as follows: (1) Model used and its exact settings; (2) Evaluation approach for the generated content; (3) Timing of testing the model; (4) Transparency of the data source; (5) Range of tested topics; (6) Randomization of selecting the queries; (7) Individual factors in selecting the queries and interrater reliability; (8) Count of queries executed to test the model; and (9) Specificity of the prompts and language used. The overall mean METRICS score was 3.0 (SD 0.58). The tested METRICS score was acceptable, with the range of Cohen ? of 0.558 to 0.962 (P<.001 for the 9 tested items). With classification per item, the highest average METRICS score was recorded for the ?Model? item, followed by the ?Specificity? item, while the lowest scores were recorded for the ?Randomization? item (classified as suboptimal) and ?Individual factors? item (classified as satisfactory). Conclusions: The METRICS checklist can facilitate the design of studies guiding researchers toward best practices in reporting results. The findings highlight the need for standardized reporting algorithms for generative AI-based studies in health care, considering the variability observed in methodologies and reporting. The proposed METRICS checklist could be a preliminary helpful base to establish a universally accepted approach to standardize the design and reporting of generative AI-based studies in health care, which is a swiftly evolving research topic. UR - https://www.i-jmr.org/2024/1/e54704 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/54704 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38276872 ID - info:doi/10.2196/54704 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Zhu, Zhihui AU - Li, Yuehuan AU - Zhang, Fan AU - Steiger, Stefanie AU - Guo, Cheng AU - Liu, Nan AU - Lu, Jiakai AU - Fan, Guangpu AU - Wu, Wenbo AU - Wu, Mingying AU - Wang, Huaibin AU - Xu, Dong AU - Chen, Yu AU - Zhu, Junming AU - Meng, Xu AU - Hou, Xiaotong AU - Anders, Hans-Joachim AU - Ye, Jian AU - Zheng, Zhe AU - Li, Chenyu AU - Zhang, Haibo PY - 2023/3/23 TI - Prediction of Male Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes Using Body Surface Area Weighted Left Ventricular End-diastolic Diameter: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e45898 VL - 12 KW - body surface area KW - BSA KW - left ventricular end-diastolic diameter KW - LVEDD KW - coronary artery bypass grafting KW - CABG KW - outcomes N2 - Background: The presence of a high left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) has been linked to a less favorable outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures. However, by taking into consideration the reference of left ventricular size and volume measurements relative to the patient's body surface area (BSA), it has been suggested that the accuracy of the predicting outcomes may be improved. Objective: We propose that BSA weighted LVEDD (bLVEDD) is a more accurate predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing CABG compared to simply using LVEDD alone. Methods: This study was a comprehensive retrospective cohort study that was conducted across multiple medical centers. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients who were admitted for treatment between October 2016 and May 2021. Only elective surgery patients were included in the study, while those undergoing emergency surgery were not considered. All participants in the study received standard care, and their clinical data were collected through the institutional registry in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Database. bLVEDD was defined as LVEDD divided by BSA. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality (30 days), and the secondary outcomes were postoperative severe adverse events, including use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, multiorgan failure, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, postoperative stroke, and postoperative myocardial infarction. Results: In total, 9474 patients from 5 centers under the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry were eligible for analysis. We found that a high LVEDD was a negative factor for male patients? mortality (odds ratio 1.44, P<.001) and secondary outcomes. For female patients, LVEDD was associated with secondary outcomes but did not reach statistical differences for morality. bLVEDD showed a strong association with postsurgery mortality (odds ratio 2.70, P<.001), and secondary outcomes changed in parallel with bLVEDD in male patients. However, bLVEDD did not reach statistical differences when fitting either mortality or severer outcomes in female patients. In male patients, the categorical bLVEDD showed high power to predict mortality (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71, P<.001) while BSA (AUC 0.62) and LVEDD (AUC 0.64) both contributed to the risk of mortality but were not as significant as bLVEDD (P<.001). Conclusions: bLVEDD is an important predictor for male mortality in CABG, removing the bias of BSA and showing a strong capability to accurately predict mortality outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02400125; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02400125 UR - https://www.i-jmr.org/2023/1/e45898 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45898 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36951893 ID - info:doi/10.2196/45898 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Röhling, Marie Hanna AU - Althoff, Patrik AU - Arsenova, Radina AU - Drebinger, Daniel AU - Gigengack, Norman AU - Chorschew, Anna AU - Kroneberg, Daniel AU - Rönnefarth, Maria AU - Ellermeyer, Tobias AU - Rosenkranz, Cathérine Sina AU - Heesen, Christoph AU - Behnia, Behnoush AU - Hirano, Shigeki AU - Kuwabara, Satoshi AU - Paul, Friedemann AU - Brandt, Ulrich Alexander AU - Schmitz-Hübsch, Tanja PY - 2022/4/1 TI - Proposal for Post Hoc Quality Control in Instrumented Motion Analysis Using Markerless Motion Capture: Development and Usability Study JO - JMIR Hum Factors SP - e26825 VL - 9 IS - 2 KW - instrumented motion analysis KW - markerless motion capture KW - visual perceptive computing KW - quality control KW - quality reporting KW - gait analysis N2 - Background: Instrumented assessment of motor symptoms has emerged as a promising extension to the clinical assessment of several movement disorders. The use of mobile and inexpensive technologies such as some markerless motion capture technologies is especially promising for large-scale application but has not transitioned into clinical routine to date. A crucial step on this path is to implement standardized, clinically applicable tools that identify and control for quality concerns. Objective: The main goal of this study comprises the development of a systematic quality control (QC) procedure for data collected with markerless motion capture technology and its experimental implementation to identify specific quality concerns and thereby rate the usability of recordings. Methods: We developed a post hoc QC pipeline that was evaluated using a large set of short motor task recordings of healthy controls (2010 recordings from 162 subjects) and people with multiple sclerosis (2682 recordings from 187 subjects). For each of these recordings, 2 raters independently applied the pipeline. They provided overall usability decisions and identified technical and performance-related quality concerns, which yielded respective proportions of their occurrence as a main result. Results: The approach developed here has proven user-friendly and applicable on a large scale. Raters? decisions on recording usability were concordant in 71.5%-92.3% of cases, depending on the motor task. Furthermore, 39.6%-85.1% of recordings were concordantly rated as being of satisfactory quality whereas in 5.0%-26.3%, both raters agreed to discard the recording. Conclusions: We present a QC pipeline that seems feasible and useful for instant quality screening in the clinical setting. Results confirm the need of QC despite using standard test setups, testing protocols, and operator training for the employed system and by extension, for other task-based motor assessment technologies. Results of the QC process can be used to clean existing data sets, optimize quality assurance measures, as well as foster the development of automated QC approaches and therefore improve the overall reliability of kinematic data sets. UR - https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2022/2/e26825 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26825 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363150 ID - info:doi/10.2196/26825 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Staffini, Alessio AU - Fujita, Kento AU - Svensson, Kishi Akiko AU - Chung, Ung-Il AU - Svensson, Thomas PY - 2022/3/18 TI - Statistical Methods for Item Reduction in a Representative Lifestyle Questionnaire: Pilot Questionnaire Study JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e28692 VL - 11 IS - 1 KW - item reduction KW - surveys and lifestyle questionnaires KW - feedback measures KW - questionnaire design KW - variance inflation factor KW - factor analysis KW - mobile phone N2 - Background: Reducing the number of items in a questionnaire while maintaining relevant information is important as it is associated with advantages such as higher respondent engagement and reduced response error. However, in health care, after the original design, an a posteriori check of the included items in a questionnaire is often overlooked or considered to be of minor importance. When conducted, this is often based on a single selected method. We argue that before finalizing any lifestyle questionnaire, a posteriori validation should always be conducted using multiple approaches to ensure the robustness of the results. Objective: The objectives of this study are to compare the results of two statistical methods for item reduction (variance inflation factor [VIF] and factor analysis [FA]) in a lifestyle questionnaire constructed by combining items from different sources and analyze the different results obtained from the 2 methods and the conclusions that can be made about the original items. Methods: Data were collected from 79 participants (heterogeneous in age and sex) with a high risk of metabolic syndrome working in a financial company based in Tokyo. The lifestyle questionnaire was constructed by combining items (asked with daily, weekly, and monthly frequency) from multiple validated questionnaires and other selected questions. Item reduction was conducted using VIF and exploratory FA. Adequacy tests were used to check the data distribution and sampling adequacy. Results: Among the daily and weekly questions, both VIF and FA identified redundancies in sleep-related items. Among the monthly questions, both approaches identified redundancies in stress-related items. However, the number of items suggested for reduction often differed: VIF suggested larger reductions than FA for daily questions but fewer reductions for weekly questions. Adequacy tests always confirmed that the structural detection was adequate for the considered items. Conclusions: As expected, our analyses showed that VIF and FA produced both similar and different findings, suggesting that questionnaire designers should consider using multiple methods for item reduction. Our findings using both methods indicate that many questions, especially those related to sleep, are redundant, indicating that the considered lifestyle questionnaire can be shortened. UR - https://www.i-jmr.org/2022/1/e28692 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28692 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35302507 ID - info:doi/10.2196/28692 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Yang, Hsuan-Chia AU - Rahmanti, Ristya Annisa AU - Huang, Chih-Wei AU - Li, Jack Yu-Chuan PY - 2022/3/4 TI - How Can Research on Artificial Empathy Be Enhanced by Applying Deepfakes? JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e29506 VL - 24 IS - 3 KW - artificial empathy KW - deepfakes KW - doctor-patient relationship KW - face emotion recognition KW - artificial intelligence KW - facial recognition KW - facial emotion recognition KW - medical images KW - patient KW - physician KW - therapy UR - https://www.jmir.org/2022/3/e29506 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29506 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254278 ID - info:doi/10.2196/29506 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Aguayo, A. Gloria AU - Goetzinger, Catherine AU - Scibilia, Renza AU - Fischer, Aurélie AU - Seuring, Till AU - Tran, Viet-Thi AU - Ravaud, Philippe AU - Bereczky, Tamás AU - Huiart, Laetitia AU - Fagherazzi, Guy PY - 2021/12/23 TI - Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e25743 VL - 23 IS - 12 KW - patient and public involvement KW - workshops KW - surveys KW - focus groups KW - co-design KW - digital cohort study KW - digital epidemiology KW - social media KW - mobile phone N2 - Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research aims to increase the quality and relevance of research by incorporating the perspective of those ultimately affected by the research. Despite these potential benefits, PPI is rarely included in epidemiology protocols. Objective: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of methods used for PPI and offer practical recommendations for its efficient implementation in epidemiological research. Methods: We conducted a review on PPI methods. We mirrored it with a patient advocate?s viewpoint about PPI. We then identified key steps to optimize PPI in epidemiological research based on our review and the viewpoint of the patient advocate, taking into account the identification of barriers to, and facilitators of, PPI. From these, we provided practical recommendations to launch a patient-centered cohort study. We used the implementation of a new digital cohort study as an exemplary use case. Results: We analyzed data from 97 studies, of which 58 (60%) were performed in the United Kingdom. The most common methods were workshops (47/97, 48%); surveys (33/97, 34%); meetings, events, or conferences (28/97, 29%); focus groups (25/97, 26%); interviews (23/97, 24%); consensus techniques (8/97, 8%); James Lind Alliance consensus technique (7/97, 7%); social media analysis (6/97, 6%); and experience-based co-design (3/97, 3%). The viewpoint of a patient advocate showed a strong interest in participating in research. The most usual PPI modalities were research ideas (60/97, 62%), co-design (42/97, 43%), defining priorities (31/97, 32%), and participation in data analysis (25/97, 26%). We identified 9 general recommendations and 32 key PPI-related steps that can serve as guidelines to increase the relevance of epidemiological studies. Conclusions: PPI is a project within a project that contributes to improving knowledge and increasing the relevance of research. PPI methods are mainly used for idea generation. On the basis of our review and case study, we recommend that PPI be included at an early stage and throughout the research cycle and that methods be combined for generation of new ideas. For e-cohorts, the use of digital tools is essential to scale up PPI. We encourage investigators to rely on our practical recommendations to extend PPI in future epidemiological studies. UR - https://www.jmir.org/2021/12/e25743 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25743 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941554 ID - info:doi/10.2196/25743 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Anneveldt, J. Kimberley AU - Nijholt, M. Ingrid AU - Schutte, M. Joke AU - Dijkstra, R. Jeroen AU - Frederix, J. Geert W. AU - Ista, Erwin AU - Verpalen, M. Inez AU - Veersema, Sebastiaan AU - Huirne, F. Judith A. AU - Hehenkamp, K. Wouter J. AU - Boomsma, F. Martijn PY - 2021/11/24 TI - Comparison of (Cost-)Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Image?Guided High-Intensity?Focused Ultrasound With Standard (Minimally) Invasive Fibroid Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MYCHOICE) JO - JMIR Res Protoc SP - e29467 VL - 10 IS - 11 KW - high-intensity?focused ultrasound ablation KW - magnetic resonance imaging, interventional KW - leiomyoma KW - randomized controlled trial KW - cost-effectiveness analysis KW - clinical trial protocol N2 - Background: Magnetic resonance image?guided high-intensity?focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is a rather new, noninvasive option for the treatment of uterine fibroids. It is safe, effective, and has a very short recovery time. However, a lack of prospectively collected data on long-term (cost-)effectiveness of the MR-HIFU treatment compared with standard uterine fibroid care prevents the MR-HIFU treatment from being reimbursed for this indication. Therefore, at this point, when conservative treatment for uterine fibroid symptoms has failed or is not accepted by patients, standard care includes the more invasive treatments hysterectomy, myomectomy, and uterine artery embolization (UAE). Primary outcomes of currently available data on MR-HIFU treatment often consist of technical outcomes, instead of patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life (QoL), and do not include the use of the latest equipment or most up-to-date treatment strategies. Moreover, data on cost-effectiveness are rare and seldom include data on a societal level such as productivity loss or use of painkillers. Because of the lack of reimbursement, broad clinical implementation has not taken place, nor is the proper role of MR-HIFU in uterine fibroid care sufficiently clear. Objective: The objective of our study is to determine the long-term (cost-)effectiveness of MR-HIFU compared with standard (minimally) invasive fibroid treatments. Methods: The MYCHOICE study is a national, multicenter, open randomized controlled trial with randomization in a 2:1 ratio to MR-HIFU or standard care including hysterectomy, myomectomy, and UAE. The sample size is 240 patients in total. Women are included when they are 18 years or older, in premenopausal stage, diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids, conservative treatment has failed or is not accepted, and eligible for MR-HIFU. Primary outcomes of the study are QoL 24 months after treatment and costs of treatment including direct health care costs, loss of productivity, and patient costs. Results: Inclusion for the MYCHOICE study started in November 2020 and enrollment will continue until 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed in 2026. Conclusions: By collecting data on the long-term (cost-)effectiveness of the MR-HIFU treatment in comparison to current standard fibroid care, we provide currently unavailable evidence about the proper place of MR-HIFU in the fibroid treatment spectrum. This will also facilitate reimbursement and inclusion of MR-HIFU in (inter)national uterine fibroid care guidelines. Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register NL8863; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8863 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29467 UR - https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/11/e29467 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29467 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821569 ID - info:doi/10.2196/29467 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Hou, Xinyao AU - Zhang, Yu AU - Wang, Yanping AU - Wang, Xinyi AU - Zhao, Jiahao AU - Zhu, Xiaobo AU - Su, Jianbo PY - 2021/11/19 TI - A Markerless 2D Video, Facial Feature Recognition?Based, Artificial Intelligence Model to Assist With Screening for Parkinson Disease: Development and Usability Study JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e29554 VL - 23 IS - 11 KW - Parkinson disease KW - facial features KW - artificial intelligence KW - diagnosis N2 - Background: Masked face is a characteristic clinical manifestation of Parkinson disease (PD), but subjective evaluations from different clinicians often show low consistency owing to a lack of accurate detection technology. Hence, it is of great significance to develop methods to make monitoring easier and more accessible. Objective: The study aimed to develop a markerless 2D video, facial feature recognition?based, artificial intelligence (AI) model to assess facial features of PD patients and investigate how AI could help neurologists improve the performance of early PD diagnosis. Methods: We collected 140 videos of facial expressions from 70 PD patients and 70 matched controls from 3 hospitals using a single 2D video camera. We developed and tested an AI model that performs masked face recognition of PD patients based on the acquisition and evaluation of facial features including geometric and texture features. Random forest, support vector machines, and k-nearest neighbor were used to train the model. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was compared with that of 5 neurologists. Results: The experimental results showed that our AI models can achieve feasible and effective facial feature recognition ability to assist with PD diagnosis. The accuracy of PD diagnosis can reach 83% using geometric features. And with the model trained by random forest, the accuracy of texture features is up to 86%. When these 2 features are combined, an F1 value of 88% can be reached, where the random forest algorithm is used. Further, the facial features of patients with PD were not associated with the motor and nonmotor symptoms of PD. Conclusions: PD patients commonly exhibit masked facial features. Videos of a facial feature recognition?based AI model can provide a valuable tool to assist with PD diagnosis and the potential of realizing remote monitoring of the patient?s condition, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. UR - https://www.jmir.org/2021/11/e29554 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29554 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806994 ID - info:doi/10.2196/29554 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Beukenhorst, L. Anna AU - Sergeant, C. Jamie AU - Schultz, M. David AU - McBeth, John AU - Yimer, B. Belay AU - Dixon, G. Will PY - 2021/11/16 TI - Understanding the Predictors of Missing Location Data to Inform Smartphone Study Design: Observational Study JO - JMIR Mhealth Uhealth SP - e28857 VL - 9 IS - 11 KW - geolocation KW - global positioning system KW - smartphones KW - mobile phone KW - mobile health KW - environmental exposures KW - data analysis KW - digital epidemiology KW - missing data KW - location data KW - mobile application N2 - Background: Smartphone location data can be used for observational health studies (to determine participant exposure or behavior) or to deliver a location-based health intervention. However, missing location data are more common when using smartphones compared to when using research-grade location trackers. Missing location data can affect study validity and intervention safety. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of missing location data and its predictors to inform design, analysis, and interpretation of future smartphone (observational and interventional) studies. Methods: We analyzed hourly smartphone location data collected from 9665 research participants on 488,400 participant days in a national smartphone study investigating the association between weather conditions and chronic pain in the United Kingdom. We used a generalized mixed-effects linear model with logistic regression to identify whether a successfully recorded geolocation was associated with the time of day, participants? time in study, operating system, time since previous survey completion, participant age, sex, and weather sensitivity. Results: For most participants, the app collected a median of 2 out of a maximum of 24 locations (1760/9665, 18.2% of participants), no location data (1664/9665, 17.2%), or complete location data (1575/9665, 16.3%). The median locations per day differed by the operating system: participants with an Android phone most often had complete data (a median of 24/24 locations) whereas iPhone users most often had a median of 2 out of 24 locations. The odds of a successfully recorded location for Android phones were 22.91 times higher than those for iPhones (95% CI 19.53-26.87). The odds of a successfully recorded location were lower during weekends (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.94-0.95) and nights (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.37-0.38), if time in study was longer (OR 0.99 per additional day in study, 95% CI 0.99-1.00), and if a participant had not used the app recently (OR 0.96 per additional day since last survey entry, 95% CI 0.96-0.96). Participant age and sex did not predict missing location data. Conclusions: The predictors of missing location data reported in our study could inform app settings and user instructions for future smartphone (observational and interventional) studies. These predictors have implications for analysis methods to deal with missing location data, such as imputation of missing values or case-only analysis. Health studies using smartphones for data collection should assess context-specific consequences of high missing data, especially among iPhone users, during the night and for disengaged participants. UR - https://mhealth.jmir.org/2021/11/e28857 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28857 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34783661 ID - info:doi/10.2196/28857 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Doumouchtsis, K. Stergios AU - Nama, Vivek AU - Falconi, Gabriele AU - Rada, Patricia Maria AU - Manonai, Jittima AU - Iancu, George AU - Haddad, Milhem Jorge AU - Betschart, Cornelia PY - 2021/11/15 TI - Developing Core Outcome Sets (COS) and Core Outcome Measures Sets (COMS) in Cosmetic Gynecological Interventions: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study JO - JMIR Res Protoc SP - e28032 VL - 10 IS - 11 KW - core outcome sets KW - core outcome measures sets KW - cosmetic gynecological surgery KW - intervention KW - labiaplasty KW - vulva KW - gynecology KW - cosmetic surgery KW - surgery KW - framework KW - outcome KW - effective KW - implementation N2 - Background: Studies evaluating cosmetic gynecological interventions have followed variable methodology and reported a diversity of outcomes. Such variations limit the comparability of studies and the value of research-based evidence. The development of core outcome sets (COS) and core outcome measures sets (COMS) would help address these issues, ensuring a minimum of outcomes important to all stakeholders, primarily women requesting or having experienced cosmetic gynecological interventions. Objective: This protocol describes the methods used in developing a COS and COMS for cosmetic gynecological interventions. Methods: An international steering group within CHORUS, including health care professionals, researchers, and women with experience in cosmetic gynecological interventions from 4 continents, will guide the development of COS and COMS. Potential outcome measures and outcomes will be identified through comprehensive literature reviews. These potential COS and COMS will be entered into an international, multi-perspective web-based Delphi survey where Delphi participants judge which domains will be core. A priori thresholds for consensus will get established before each Delphi round. The Delphi survey results will be evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively in subsequent stakeholder group consensus meetings in the process of establishing ?core? outcomes. Results: Dissemination and implementation of the resulting COS and COMS within an international context will be promoted and reviewed. Conclusions: This protocol presents the steps in developing a COS and COMS for cosmetic gynecological interventions. Embedding the COS and COMS for cosmetic gynecological interventions within future clinical trials, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines could contribute to enhancing the value of research and improving overall patient care. Trial Registration: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) 1592; https://tinyurl.com/n8faysuh International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/28032 UR - https://www.researchprotocols.org/2021/11/e28032 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28032 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779787 ID - info:doi/10.2196/28032 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Noorbergen, J. Tyler AU - Adam, P. Marc T. AU - Teubner, Timm AU - Collins, E. Clare PY - 2021/11/10 TI - Using Co-design in Mobile Health System Development: A Qualitative Study With Experts in Co-design and Mobile Health System Development JO - JMIR Mhealth Uhealth SP - e27896 VL - 9 IS - 11 KW - co-design KW - mHealth KW - guidelines KW - qualitative study KW - mobile phone N2 - Background: The proliferation of mobile devices has enabled new ways of delivering health services through mobile health systems. Researchers and practitioners emphasize that the design of such systems is a complex endeavor with various pitfalls, including limited stakeholder involvement in design processes and the lack of integration into existing system landscapes. Co-design is an approach used to address these pitfalls. By recognizing users as experts of their own experience, co-design directly involves users in the design process and provides them an active role in knowledge development, idea generation, and concept development. Objective: Despite the existence of a rich body of literature on co-design methodologies, limited research exists to guide the co-design of mobile health (mHealth) systems. This study aims to contextualize an existing co-design framework for mHealth applications and construct guidelines to address common challenges of co-designing mHealth systems. Methods: Tapping into the knowledge and experience of experts in co-design and mHealth systems development, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study consisting of 16 semistructured interviews. Thereby, a constructivist ontological position was adopted while acknowledging the socially constructed nature of reality in mHealth system development. Purposive sampling across web-based platforms (eg, Google Scholar and ResearchGate) and publications by authors with co-design experience in mHealth were used to recruit co-design method experts (n=8) and mHealth system developers (n=8). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis along with our objectives of contextualizing the co-design framework and constructing guidelines for applying co-design to mHealth systems development. Results: The contextualized framework captures important considerations of the mHealth context, including dedicated prototyping and implementation phases, and an emphasis on immersion in real-world contexts. In addition, 7 guidelines were constructed that directly pertain to mHealth: understanding stakeholder vulnerabilities and diversity, health behavior change, co-design facilitators, immersion in the mHealth ecosystem, postdesign advocates, health-specific evaluation criteria, and usage data and contextual research to understand impact. Conclusions: System designers encounter unique challenges when engaging in mHealth systems development. The contextualized co-design framework and constructed guidelines have the potential to serve as a shared frame of reference to guide the co-design of mHealth systems and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration at the nexus of information technology and health research. UR - https://mhealth.jmir.org/2021/11/e27896 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27896 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757323 ID - info:doi/10.2196/27896 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Hao, Tianyong AU - Huang, Zhengxing AU - Liang, Likeng AU - Weng, Heng AU - Tang, Buzhou PY - 2021/10/21 TI - Health Natural Language Processing: Methodology Development and Applications JO - JMIR Med Inform SP - e23898 VL - 9 IS - 10 KW - health care KW - unstructured text KW - natural language processing KW - methodology KW - application UR - https://medinform.jmir.org/2021/10/e23898 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23898 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34673533 ID - info:doi/10.2196/23898 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gaudet-Blavignac, Christophe AU - Rudaz, Andrea AU - Lovis, Christian PY - 2021/10/13 TI - Building a Shared, Scalable, and Sustainable Source for the Problem-Oriented Medical Record: Developmental Study JO - JMIR Med Inform SP - e29174 VL - 9 IS - 10 KW - medical records KW - problem-oriented KW - electronic health records KW - semantics N2 - Background: Since the creation of the problem-oriented medical record, the building of problem lists has been the focus of many studies. To date, this issue is not well resolved, and building an appropriate contextualized problem list is still a challenge. Objective: This paper aims to present the process of building a shared multipurpose common problem list at the Geneva University Hospitals. This list aims to bridge the gap between clinicians? language expressed in free text and secondary uses requiring structured information. Methods: We focused on the needs of clinicians by building a list of uniquely identified expressions to support their daily activities. In the second stage, these expressions were connected to additional information to build a complex graph of information. A list of 45,946 expressions manually extracted from clinical documents was manually curated and encoded in multiple semantic dimensions, such as International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision; International Classification of Primary Care 2nd edition; Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms; or dimensions dictated by specific usages, such as identifying expressions specific to a domain, a gender, or an intervention. The list was progressively deployed for clinicians with an iterative process of quality control, maintenance, and improvements, including the addition of new expressions or dimensions for specific needs. The problem management of the electronic health record allowed the measurement and correction of encoding based on real-world use. Results: The list was deployed in production in January 2017 and was regularly updated and deployed in new divisions of the hospital. Over 4 years, 684,102 problems were created using the list. The proportion of free-text entries decreased progressively from 37.47% (8321/22,206) in December 2017 to 18.38% (4547/24,738) in December 2020. In the last version of the list, over 14 dimensions were mapped to expressions, among which 5 were international classifications and 8 were other classifications for specific uses. The list became a central axis in the electronic health record, being used for many different purposes linked to care, such as surgical planning or emergency wards, or in research, for various predictions using machine learning techniques. Conclusions: This study breaks with common approaches primarily by focusing on real clinicians? language when expressing patients? problems and secondarily by mapping whatever is required, including controlled vocabularies to answer specific needs. This approach improves the quality of the expression of patients? problems while allowing the building of as many structured dimensions as needed to convey semantics according to specific contexts. The method is shown to be scalable, sustainable, and efficient at hiding the complexity of semantics or the burden of constraint-structured problem list entry for clinicians. Ongoing work is analyzing the impact of this approach on how clinicians express patients? problems. UR - https://medinform.jmir.org/2021/10/e29174 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29174 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643542 ID - info:doi/10.2196/29174 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Szinay, Dorothy AU - Cameron, Rory AU - Naughton, Felix AU - Whitty, A. Jennifer AU - Brown, Jamie AU - Jones, Andy PY - 2021/10/11 TI - Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e32365 VL - 23 IS - 10 KW - discrete choice experiment KW - stated preference methods KW - mHealth KW - digital health KW - quantitative methodology KW - uptake KW - engagement KW - methodology KW - preference KW - Bayesian KW - design KW - tutorial KW - qualitative KW - user preference UR - https://www.jmir.org/2021/10/e32365 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32365 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34633290 ID - info:doi/10.2196/32365 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Markowski, L. Kelly AU - Smith, A. Jeffrey AU - Gauthier, Robin G. AU - Harcey, R. Sela PY - 2021/9/24 TI - Patterns of Missing Data With Ecological Momentary Assessment Among People Who Use Drugs: Feasibility Study Using Pilot Study Data JO - JMIR Form Res SP - e31421 VL - 5 IS - 9 KW - EMA KW - ecological momentary assessment KW - PWUD KW - people who use drugs KW - noncompliance KW - missing data KW - mobile phone N2 - Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a set of research methods that capture events, feelings, and behaviors as they unfold in their real-world setting. Capturing data in the moment reduces important sources of measurement error but also generates challenges for noncompliance (ie, missing data). To date, EMA research has only examined the overall rates of noncompliance. Objective: In this study, we identify four types of noncompliance among people who use drugs and aim to examine the factors associated with the most common types. Methods: Data were obtained from a recent pilot study of 28 Nebraskan people who use drugs who answered EMA questions for 2 weeks. We examined questions that were not answered because they were skipped, they expired, the phone was switched off, or the phone died after receiving them. Results: We found that the phone being switched off and questions expiring comprised 93.34% (1739/1863 missing question-instances) of our missing data. Generalized structural equation model results show that participant-level factors, including age (relative risk ratio [RRR]=0.93; P=.005), gender (RRR=0.08; P=.006), homelessness (RRR=3.80; P=.04), personal device ownership (RRR=0.14; P=.008), and network size (RRR=0.57; P=.001), are important for predicting off missingness, whereas only question-level factors, including time of day (ie, morning compared with afternoon, RRR=0.55; P<.001) and day of week (ie, Tuesday-Saturday compared with Sunday, RRR=0.70, P=.02; RRR=0.64, P=.005; RRR=0.58, P=.001; RRR=0.55, P<.001; and RRR=0.66, P=.008, respectively) are important for predicting expired missingness. The week of study is important for both (ie, week 2 compared with week 1, RRR=1.21, P=.03, for off missingness and RRR=1.98, P<.001, for expired missingness). Conclusions: We suggest a three-pronged strategy to preempt missing EMA data with high-risk populations: first, provide additional resources for participants likely to experience phone charging problems (eg, people experiencing homelessness); second, ask questions when participants are not likely to experience competing demands (eg, morning); and third, incentivize continued compliance as the study progresses. Attending to these issues can help researchers ensure maximal data quality. UR - https://formative.jmir.org/2021/9/e31421 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31421 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34464327 ID - info:doi/10.2196/31421 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Memiah, Peter AU - Kamau, Anne AU - Opanga, Yvonne AU - Muhula, Samuel AU - Nyakeriga, Emmanuel AU - Humwa, Felix AU - Cook, Courtney AU - Kingori, Caroline AU - Muriithi, Job PY - 2020/12/31 TI - Using Friendship Ties to Understand the Prevalence of, and Factors Associated With, Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Kenya: Cross-Sectional, Respondent-Driven Survey Study JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e19023 VL - 9 IS - 4 KW - intimate partner violence KW - adolescents KW - young adults KW - bullying KW - physical abuse KW - abuse KW - Africa KW - prevalence KW - risk N2 - Background: Optimization of innovative approaches is required for estimating the intimate partner violence (IPV) burden among adolescents and young adults (AYA). Further investigation is required to identify risk and protective factors associated with IPV among AYA. There remain significant gaps in understanding these factors among this vulnerable population. Objective: The goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of IPV among an urban population of AYA and to identify factors associated with IPV among AYA. Methods: A cross-sectional study design utilizing respondent-driven sampling was adopted. The study was conducted among 887 AYA, aged 15 to 24 years, residing in Nairobi, Kenya. Data were collected through a phone-based survey using the REACH (Reaching, Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults for Care Continuum in Health)-AYA app. Questions on behavioral and psychosocial factors were adopted from different standardized questionnaires. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the study sample. Results: Of the 887 participants, a higher proportion were male (540/887, 60.9%) compared to female (347/887, 39.1%). The prevalence of IPV was 22.3% (124/556). IPV was associated with being unsure if it was okay for a boy to hit his girlfriend, living in a home with physical violence or abuse, and being bullied (P=.005). The likelihood of experiencing IPV was higher among respondents whose friends and family members used alcohol (odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.98) and among those who had repeated a class at school in the past two years (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.11-3.23). Respondents who visited a health facility or doctor for reproductive health services were 2 times more likely to experience IPV (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.40-3.70). Respondents who had used illicit drugs were 2 times more likely to experience IPV (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.64-7.04). The probability of experiencing IPV decreased by 63% (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85) among respondents who refused to have sex with someone who was not prepared to use a condom. Conclusions: IPV remains a significant public health priority because of its impact to society. Our results are in congruence with other similar studies. Efforts toward incorporating appropriate IPV core measures into the comprehensive care package for every AYA seeking health services should be explored. Programs need to address constellations of risk and protective factors linked to IPV in an effort to prevent its occurrence. UR - http://www.i-jmr.org/2020/4/e19023/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19023 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382380 ID - info:doi/10.2196/19023 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Appalasamy, Rani Jamuna AU - Joseph, Pauline Joyce AU - Seeta Ramaiah, Siva AU - Md Zain, Zaini Anuar AU - Quek, Fatt Kia AU - Tha, Kyi Kyi PY - 2020/7/10 TI - Video Narratives Intervention Among Stroke Survivors: Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial JO - JMIR Aging SP - e17182 VL - 3 IS - 2 KW - feasibility and acceptability KW - medication understanding KW - use self-efficacy KW - stroke KW - video narratives N2 - Background: A large number of stroke survivors worldwide suffer from moderate to severe disability. In Malaysia, long-term uncontrolled stroke risk factors lead to unforeseen rates of recurrent stroke and a growing incidence of stroke occurrence across ages, predominantly among the elderly population. This situation has motivated research efforts focused on tapping into patient education, especially related to patient self-efficacy of understanding and taking medication appropriately. Video narratives integrated with health belief model constructs have demonstrated potential impacts as an aide to patient education efforts. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of study procedures based on a randomized controlled trial protocol of a video narratives intervention among poststroke patients. We also aimed to obtain preliminary findings of video narratives related to medication understanding and use self-efficacy (MUSE) and blood pressure control. Methods: A parallel group randomized controlled trial including a control group (without video viewing) and an intervention group (with video viewing) was conducted by researchers at a neurology outpatient clinic on poststroke patients (N=54). Baseline data included patients? sociodemographic characteristics, medical information, and all outcome measures. Measurements of MUSE and blood pressure following the trial were taken during a 3-month follow-up period. Feasibility of the trial was assessed based on recruitment and study completion rates along with patients? feedback on the burden of the study procedures and outcome measures. Acceptability of the trial was analyzed qualitatively. Statistical analysis was applied to ascertain the preliminary results of video narratives. Results: The recruitment rate was 60 out of 117 patients (51.3%). Nevertheless, the dropout rate of 10% was within the acceptable range. Patients were aged between 21 and 74 years. Nearly 50 of the patients (>85%) had adequate health literacy and exposure to stroke education. Most of the patients (>80%) were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, whereby the majority had primary hypertension. The technicalities of randomization and patient approach were carried out with minimal challenge and adequate patient satisfaction. The video contents received good responses with respect to comprehension and simplicity. Moreover, an in-depth phone interview with 8 patients indicated that the video narratives were considered to be useful and inspiring. These findings paralleled the preliminary findings of significant improvement within groups in MUSE (P=.001) and systolic blood pressure control (P=.04). Conclusions: The queries and feedback from each phase in this study have been acknowledged and will be taken forward in the full trial. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12618000174280; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373554 UR - https://aging.jmir.org/2020/2/e17182 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17182 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469839 ID - info:doi/10.2196/17182 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Schoeb, Dominik AU - Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo AU - Hein, Simon AU - Dressler, Friedrich Franz AU - Adams, Fabian AU - Schlager, Daniel AU - Miernik, Arkadiusz PY - 2020/3/30 TI - Use of Artificial Intelligence for Medical Literature Search: Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Hackathon Format JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e16606 VL - 9 IS - 1 KW - artificial intelligence KW - literature review KW - medical information technology N2 - Background: Mapping out the research landscape around a project is often time consuming and difficult. Objective: This study evaluates a commercial artificial intelligence (AI) search engine (IRIS.AI) for its applicability in an automated literature search on a specific medical topic. Methods: To evaluate the AI search engine in a standardized manner, the concept of a science hackathon was applied. Three groups of researchers were tasked with performing a literature search on a clearly defined scientific project. All participants had a high level of expertise for this specific field of research. Two groups were given access to the AI search engine IRIS.AI. All groups were given the same amount of time for their search and were instructed to document their results. Search results were summarized and ranked according to a predetermined scoring system. Results: The final scoring awarded 49 and 39 points out of 60 to AI groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the control group received 46 points. A total of 20 scientific studies with high relevance were identified, and 5 highly relevant studies (?spot on?) were reported by each group. Conclusions: AI technology is a promising approach to facilitate literature searches and the management of medical libraries. In this study, however, the application of AI technology lead to a more focused literature search without a significant improvement in the number of results. UR - http://www.i-jmr.org/2020/1/e16606/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16606 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32224481 ID - info:doi/10.2196/16606 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gower, D. Aubrey AU - Moreno, A. Megan PY - 2018/11/19 TI - A Novel Approach to Evaluating Mobile Smartphone Screen Time for iPhones: Feasibility and Preliminary Findings JO - JMIR Mhealth Uhealth SP - e11012 VL - 6 IS - 11 KW - smartphone KW - youth KW - mobile apps KW - mobile phone KW - screenshot N2 - Background: Increasingly high levels of smartphone ownership and use pose the potential risk for addictive behaviors and negative health outcomes, particularly among younger populations. Previous methodologies to understand mobile screen time have relied on self-report surveys or ecological momentary assessments (EMAs). Self-report is subject to bias and unreliability, while EMA can be burdensome to participants. Thus, a new methodology is needed to advance the understanding of mobile screen time. Objective: The objective of this study was to test the feasibility of a novel methodology to record and evaluate mobile smartphone screen time and use: battery use screenshot (BUS). Methods: The BUS approach, defined for this study as uploading a mobile phone screenshot of a specific page within a smartphone, was utilized within a Web-based cross-sectional survey of adolescents aged 12-15 years through the survey platform Qualtrics. Participants were asked to provide a screenshot of their battery use page, a feature within an iPhone, to upload within the Web-based survey. Feasibility was assessed by smartphone ownership and response rate to the BUS upload request. Data availability was evaluated as apps per BUS, completeness of data within the screenshot, and five most used apps based on battery use percentage. Results: Among those surveyed, 26.73% (309/1156) indicated ownership of a smartphone. A total of 105 screenshots were evaluated. For data availability, screenshots contained an average of 10.2 (SD 2.0) apps per screenshot and over half (58/105, 55.2%) had complete data available. The most common apps or functions included Safari and Home and Lock Screen. Conclusions: Study findings describe the BUS as a novel approach for real-time data collection focused on iPhone screen time and use among young adolescents. Although feasibility showed some challenges in the upload capacity of young teens, data availability was generally strong across this large dataset. These data from screenshots have the potential to provide key insights into precise mobile smartphone screen use and time spent per mobile app. Future studies could explore the use of the BUS methodology on other mobile smartphones such as Android phones to correlate mobile smartphone screen time with health outcomes. UR - http://mhealth.jmir.org/2018/11/e11012/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11012 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455163 ID - info:doi/10.2196/11012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Amann, Julia AU - Rubinelli, Sara PY - 2017/10/10 TI - Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e320 VL - 19 IS - 10 KW - community networks KW - internet KW - patient-centered care KW - telemedicine KW - community participation KW - co-creation N2 - Background: The use of online communities to promote end user involvement and co-creation in the product and service innovation process is well documented in the marketing and management literature. Whereas online communities are widely used for health care service provision and peer-to-peer support, only little is known about how they could be integrated into the health care innovation process. Objective: The overall objective of this qualitative study was to explore community managers? views on and experiences with knowledge co-creation in online communities for people with disabilities. Methods: A descriptive qualitative research design was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nine community managers. To complement the interview data, additional information was retrieved from the communities in the form of structural information (number of registered users, number and names of topic areas covered by the forum) and administrative information (terms and conditions and privacy statements, forum rules). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Our results highlight two main aspects: peer-to-peer knowledge co-creation and types of collaboration with external actors. Although community managers strongly encouraged peer-to-peer knowledge co-creation, our findings indicated that these activities were not common practice in the communities under investigation. In fact, much of what related to co-creation, prototyping, and product development was still perceived to be directed by professionals and experts. Community managers described the role of their respective communities as informing this process rather than a driving force. The role of community members as advisors to researchers, health care professionals, and businesses was discussed in the context of types of collaboration with external actors. According to the community managers, most of the external inquiries related to research projects of students or health care professionals in training, who often joined a community for the sole purpose of recruiting participants for their research. Despite this unilateral form of knowledge co-creation, community managers acknowledged the mere interest of these user groups as beneficial, as long as their interest was not purely financially motivated. Being able to contribute to advancing research, improving products, and informing the planning and design of health care services were described as some of the key motivations to engage with external stakeholders. Conclusions: This paper draws attention to the currently under-investigated role of online communities as platforms for collaboration and co-creation between patients, health care professionals, researchers, and businesses. It describes community managers? views on and experiences with knowledge co-creation and provides recommendations on how these activities can be leveraged to foster knowledge co-creation in health care. Engaging in knowledge co-creation with online health communities may ultimately help to inform the planning and design of products, services, and research activities that better meet the actual needs of those living with a disability. UR - https://www.jmir.org/2017/10/e320/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7406 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017993 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.7406 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Legleye, Stephane AU - Pennec, Sophie AU - Monnier, Alain AU - Stephan, Amandine AU - Brouard, Nicolas AU - Bilsen, Johan AU - Cohen, Joachim PY - 2016/02/18 TI - Surveying End-of-Life Medical Decisions in France: Evaluation of an Innovative Mixed-Mode Data Collection Strategy JO - Interact J Med Res SP - e8 VL - 5 IS - 1 KW - end-of-life decisions KW - France KW - methodology KW - mixed-mode survey N2 - Background: Monitoring medical decisions at the end of life has become an important issue in many societies. Built on previous European experiences, the survey and project Fin de Vie en France (?End of Life in France,? or EOLF) was conducted in 2010 to provide an overview of medical end-of-life decisions in France. Objective: To describe the methodology of EOLF and evaluate the effects of design innovations on data quality. Methods: EOLF used a mixed-mode data collection strategy (paper and Internet) along with follow-up campaigns that employed various contact modes (paper and telephone), all of which were gathered from various institutions (research team, hospital, and medical authorities at the regional level). A telephone nonresponse survey was also used. Through descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions, these innovations were assessed in terms of their effects on the response rate, quality of the sample, and differences between Web-based and paper questionnaires. Results: The participation rate was 40.0% (n=5217). The respondent sample was very close to the sampling frame. The Web-based questionnaires represented only 26.8% of the questionnaires, and the Web-based secured procedure led to limitations in data management. The follow-up campaigns had a strong effect on participation, especially for paper questionnaires. With higher participation rates (63.21% and 63.74%), the telephone follow-up and nonresponse surveys showed that only a very low proportion of physicians refused to participate because of the topic or the absence of financial incentive. A multivariate analysis showed that physicians who answered on the Internet reported less medication to hasten death, and that they more often took no medical decisions in the end-of-life process. Conclusions: Varying contact modes is a useful strategy. Using a mixed-mode design is interesting, but selection and measurement effects must be studied further in this sensitive field. UR - http://www.i-jmr.org/2016/1/e8/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3712 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26892632 ID - info:doi/10.2196/ijmr.3712 ER -