Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 211 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Large Language Model–Based Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Documentation in the Electronic Health Record Across Two Institutions: Development and Validation Study

Large Language Model–Based Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Documentation in the Electronic Health Record Across Two Institutions: Development and Validation Study

AI-augmented assessment of CR documentation has also been implemented in clinical environments; we have previously reported on an NLP-based supervised ML model that provides feedback on internal medicine (IM) residents CR documentation [17]. However, this model was developed using earlier technologies and only provides binary feedback.

Verity Schaye, David DiTullio, Benedict Vincent Guzman, Scott Vennemeyer, Hanniel Shih, Ilan Reinstein, Danielle E Weber, Abbie Goodman, Danny T Y Wu, Daniel J Sartori, Sally A Santen, Larry Gruppen, Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs, Jesse Burk-Rafel

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67967

Digital Assessment of Cognitive Health in Outpatient Primary Care: Usability Study

Digital Assessment of Cognitive Health in Outpatient Primary Care: Usability Study

Linus Health’s Core Cognitive Evaluation (CCE) is a tablet-based cognitive assessment tool consisting of an immediate recall task, a digital CDT administered on an Apple i Pad using an Apple Pencil, and a delayed recall task (collectively termed Digital Clock and Recall [DCR]) [19,20].

Adam J Doerr, Taylor A Orwig, Matthew McNulty, Stephanie Denise M Sison, David R Paquette, Robert Leung, Huitong Ding, Stephen B Erban, Bruce R Weinstein, Yurima Guilarte-Walker, Adrian H Zai, Allan J Walkey, Apurv Soni, David D McManus, Honghuang Lin

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66695

FRAILSURVEY—an mHealth App for Self-Assessment of Frailty Based on the Portuguese Version of the Groningen Frailty Indicator: Validation and Reliability Study

FRAILSURVEY—an mHealth App for Self-Assessment of Frailty Based on the Portuguese Version of the Groningen Frailty Indicator: Validation and Reliability Study

However, evaluating frailty poses challenges due to its multifactorial nature, resulting in various tools and methods commonly used for its assessment. It is crucial to recognize that every assessment tool is flawed, lacks standardization, and different approaches may be more suitable for specific populations or settings [10,12]. The Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) stands out for its comprehensive assessment for evaluating frailty in older adults.

Luis Midao, Mafalda Duarte, Rute Sampaio, Marta Almada, Cláudia Camila Dias, Constança Paúl, Elísio Costa

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e51975

Assessing Digital Maturity of Hospitals: Viewpoint Comparing National Approaches in Five Countries

Assessing Digital Maturity of Hospitals: Viewpoint Comparing National Approaches in Five Countries

Countries included in this review were sampled opportunistically through our existing networks in the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and European Federation of Medical Informatics Evaluation Working Groups on technology assessment and evaluation [14,15]. Snowballing through this network identified additional stakeholders.

Kathrin Cresswell, Franziska Jahn, Line Silsand, Leanna Woods, Tim Postema, Marion Logan, Sevala Malkic, Elske Ammenwerth

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e57858

Building Consensus on the Relevant Criteria to Screen for Depressive Symptoms Among Near-Centenarians and Centenarians: Modified e-Delphi Study

Building Consensus on the Relevant Criteria to Screen for Depressive Symptoms Among Near-Centenarians and Centenarians: Modified e-Delphi Study

In addition to rating the relevance of each item, experts were asked to indicate the most suitable type of assessment for each criterion: self-assessment, hetero-assessment, or both. This was intended to identify preferred methods of assessing potential depressive signs and symptoms. The aim was not to achieve a stringent consensus of 70% as with the relevance ratings but to capture a broad spectrum of expert opinions on assessment approaches.

Carla Gomes da Rocha, Armin von Gunten, Pierre Vandel, Daniela S Jopp, Olga Ribeiro, Henk Verloo

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e64352

Experiences With an In-Bed Real-Time Motion Monitoring System on a Geriatric Ward: Mixed Methods Study

Experiences With an In-Bed Real-Time Motion Monitoring System on a Geriatric Ward: Mixed Methods Study

The study addressed the perception of nurses on several aspects as adverse events and the implementation in the clinical setting, as well as their assessment of usefulness. Therefore, nurses on regular wards at a university medical center used a bed exit system to better understand its potential in hospitals [10].

Stefan Walzer, Isabel Schön, Johanna Pfeil, Nicola Merz, Helga Marx, Sven Ziegler, Christophe Kunze

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63572

Text Messaging Interventions for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Emergency Departments: Mixed Methods Assessment of Implementation Barriers and Facilitators

Text Messaging Interventions for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Emergency Departments: Mixed Methods Assessment of Implementation Barriers and Facilitators

Reference 32: Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measuresassessment mixed methods assessmentText Messaging Interventions for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Emergency Departments: Mixed Methods Assessment

Megan O'Grady, Laura Harrison, Adekemi Suleiman, Morica Hutchison, Nancy Kwon, Frederick Muench, Sandeep Kapoor

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65187

The Utilization of Electronic Consultations (eConsults) to Address Emerging Questions Related to Long COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada: Mixed Methods Analysis

The Utilization of Electronic Consultations (eConsults) to Address Emerging Questions Related to Long COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada: Mixed Methods Analysis

An assessment of e Consults highlighted 5 common question types, providing insight into potential gaps in knowledge among PCPs that could help guide medical education and policy.

Jatinderpreet Singh, Michael Quon, Danica Goulet, Erin Keely, Clare Liddy

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e58582