e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 19 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 8 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 5 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 4 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Publication Counts in Context: Normalization Using Query and Reference Terms in PubMed
Publication counts on Pub Med can be visualized through simple plots that display the number of publications over time, providing an easy way to track trends and patterns in scientific output. Publication counts over time are often used in science communication, research applications, original articles, or reviews to illustrate trends in scientific activity in a particular field [1-4]. A search on Pub Med readily generates corresponding publication counts from year to year (Figure 1).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60616
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing Retraction Patterns by Country
Data from 2013 to 2015 show that retraction rates vary by country due to differences in research culture, regulations, and publication pressures [3]. Understanding these variations is vital to identifying systemic issues in research integrity.
We examined the countries with the highest numbers of retractions due to misconduct, analyzing both absolute counts and proportions relative to population size and publication output.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65775
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We appreciate Wang and Zhou’s [1] keen interest in our publication [2]. Below are our responses to their comments.
First, Wang and Zhou [1] argued potential biases could arise from the 8 experts’ personal preferences, academic or cultural backgrounds, or their familiarity with the subject matter. However, the 30 papers we selected were from 3 different journals and explored various topics (as outlined in Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1 of our paper [2]).
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e65123
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis
publication
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55920
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Application of AI in Sepsis: Citation Network Analysis and Evidence Synthesis
The annual publication count, annual growth, and average growth rate of publications were determined through the following methods:
Where N is the total number of articles in the current year, and Nk–1 is the total number of articles in the previous year.
Furthermore, we conducted an analysis of publication trends based on the following criteria: the top 10 most prolific countries, institutions, journals, authors, and studies in this area.
Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e54490
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Although the use of Chat GPT as a research assistant for scientific paper composition and publication has gained significant attention, several concerns have emerged. First, AI models trained on vast amounts of text data may inadvertently generate content that closely resembles existing scientific work, leading to instances of plagiarism [1]. Second, AI models can generate seemingly plausible content that lacks accuracy or may unintentionally introduce errors.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51229
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The primary aim of this study was to investigate inconsistencies between a protocol and its publication when developing an UR. The secondary aim was to assess the transparency of the URs when generating evidence.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43299
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Retractions in Dermatology Literature Between 1982 and 2022: Cross-sectional Study
Information regarding article type, country of authors, reasons for retraction, publication year, and the number of months between publication and retraction for each paper were collected, and linear regression was performed to assess trends of retractions over time.
Between 1982 and 2022, there were a total of 178 retracted articles in the field of dermatology. The most common article types were “Research Article” (n=91), “Review Article” (n=31), “Clinical Study” (n=25), and “Case Report” (n=21).
JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e39021
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, it is unclear which actors (eg, countries, sectors, and agencies) contribute to this field in terms of peer-reviewed publication outputs.
The aim of this study was to determine the countries and organizations responsible for leading the research in the field of epidemiological criminology.
Interact J Med Res 2022;11(2):e42891
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS