Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 10 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Patterns of Use and Withdrawal Syndrome in Dual Cannabis and Tobacco Users (DuCATA_GAM-CAT): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Patterns of Use and Withdrawal Syndrome in Dual Cannabis and Tobacco Users (DuCATA_GAM-CAT): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

With input from participating groups, an external company experienced in gamified web app design, along with patients and researchers, designs the web app prototype. The prototype incorporates variables of interest in an engaging manner. The same participants involved in co-design will pilot the web app. The aim is to monitor patterns of use of cannabis and tobacco, withdrawal symptoms, abstinence, and other indicators among cannabis users. This study uses a prospective longitudinal follow-up approach.

Judith Saura, Ariadna Feliu, Marta Enríquez-Mestre, Marcela Fu, Montse Ballbè, Yolanda Castellano, Margarida Pla, Nathalia Rosa, Petia Radeva, Elena Maestre-González, Carmen Cabezas, Joan Colom, Josep M Suelves, Silvia Mondon, Pablo Barrio, Magalí Andreu, Antònia Raich, Jordi Bernabeu, Jordi Vilaplana, Xavier Roca Tutusaus, Joseph Guydish, Esteve Fernández, Cristina Martínez

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e58335

Narrowing the Digital Divide: Framework for Creating Telehealth Equity Dashboards

Narrowing the Digital Divide: Framework for Creating Telehealth Equity Dashboards

Based on the review of the existing literature and the operational experience of clinicians, informaticists, and researchers in this workgroup, we aim to describe a strategic framework for adult- and pediatrics-serving health systems to execute telehealth equity dashboards through 3 phases: define, design, and deploy (Figure 1).

Michael J Luke, Sansanee Craig, Suzinne Pak-Gorstein, Marlíse Arellano, Jessica Zhang, S Margaret Wright, John Chuo, Philip V Scribano

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e57435

Promoting Collaborative Scholarship During the COVID-19 Pandemic Through an Innovative COVID-19 Data Explorer and Repository at Yale School of Medicine: Development and Usability Study

Promoting Collaborative Scholarship During the COVID-19 Pandemic Through an Innovative COVID-19 Data Explorer and Repository at Yale School of Medicine: Development and Usability Study

Through our interface’s statistical visualizations, we offered the opportunity to evaluate certain clinical variables of interest, while researchers were building their hypotheses and adjusting their research proposals. In addition, the request process for access to the data repository was streamlined and simplified, which removed barriers to research activities.

Angela Maria Victoria-Castro, Tanima Arora, Michael Simonov, Aditya Biswas, Jameel Alausa, Labeebah Subair, Brett Gerber, Andrew Nguyen, Allen Hsiao, Richard Hintz, Yu Yamamoto, Robert Soufer, Gary Desir, Francis Perry Wilson, Merceditas Villanueva

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e52120

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review

Two researchers searched Pub Med, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library with a comprehensive search strategy up to November 2023. In addition, we searched “Google Scholar” to identify gray literature and searched for references of eligible articles. Two researchers independently screened the titles and abstracts and reviewed the full texts to identify eligible studies. Any discrepancies were resolved through consultation with a third researcher until a consensus was reached.

Bowen Zha, Angshu Cai, Guiqi Wang

JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e56361

Motor Effects of Intervention With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Physiotherapy Treatment in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Motor Effects of Intervention With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Physiotherapy Treatment in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

The participants will be blinded to the treatment allocation during the trial, but the researchers conducting this study will be aware of the treatment allocation. This study will conform to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial) guidelines for nonpharmacological interventions. This study has been approved by the ethics committee in research.

Anna Izabel Cangussu, Beatriz Lucarini, Igor de Freitas Melo, Paula Araújo Diniz, Marisa Mancini, Bernardo de Mattos Viana, Marco Aurélio Romano-Silva, Débora Marques de Miranda

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e52922

How I Built My Personal, Patient-Centered Health Care Team: Instead of Doctors, I Started With Students

How I Built My Personal, Patient-Centered Health Care Team: Instead of Doctors, I Started With Students

It was indeed a joy collaborating with them for they are natural researchers (and remain close friends). I like to believe I am sane, but I realize that if my heart, lungs, and kidneys can fail, so can my brain. Thus, it is nice to know that one ex-student co-author is now a resident in psychiatry, and another is a psychiatric nurse. Broadening my coverage, 3 ex-students who have published extensively with me are now board-certified Ph D clinical psychologists.

Richard Wassersug

JMIR Cancer 2023;9:e44693

Planning and Reporting Effective Web-Based RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Panels: Literature Review and Preliminary Recommendations

Planning and Reporting Effective Web-Based RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Panels: Literature Review and Preliminary Recommendations

Researchers in 1 (8%) study revised a list of clinical indications based on input from panelists in Rating 1 and distributed this information to participants after the first rating [17]. During this time, panelists review and discuss the ratings, focusing on indications with significant disagreement [1].

Jordan B Sparks, Mandi L Klamerus, Tanner J Caverly, Sarah E Skurla, Timothy P Hofer, Eve A Kerr, Steven J Bernstein, Laura J Damschroder

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e33898

Perspectives and Experiences of Policy Makers, Researchers, Health Information Technology Professionals, and the Public on Evidence-Based Health Policies: Protocol for a Qualitative Study

Perspectives and Experiences of Policy Makers, Researchers, Health Information Technology Professionals, and the Public on Evidence-Based Health Policies: Protocol for a Qualitative Study

In the literature, there is an ongoing debate between researchers and policy makers about EBHP, mainly because of a misunderstanding or a lack of a common definition of evidence [2,3] as well as a lack of agreement on what constitutes evidence across disciplines [4]. The communities of researchers have perspectives in the development of health policies that are distinct from those of policy makers, which result in these professional cultures working in separate “silos.”

Anastasia Mallidou, Dzifa Dordunoo, Elizabeth Borycki, Andre Kushniruk, Kirsten Sadeghi-Yekta, Julie Fraser, Sirisha Asuri

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(12):e16268