e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 6 of 6 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The subject- and topic-level scores highlight the suitability of different models for different domains. GPT-4 appears to have the highest score (300/700, 42.9%), followed by GPT-3.5 (145/700, 20.7%), and then Bard (115/700, 16.4%). This demonstrates that Bard was not able to pass the NEET-2023 admission exam, and GPT-3.5 was only 2% (14/700) away from the cutoff score, which is 19% (133/700).
JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e51523
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The information obtained on the associated factors could, in principle, be used by professionals when evaluating the client’s suitability for using digital health and social care. However, it may also lead to making generalizations and assumptions about suitability without individual assessment. Stereotypical thinking about suitable users (eg, based on age) increases the risk that some clients who could use and benefit from digital services might remain unrecognized.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51450
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To this end, the suitability of educational materials that are easy to understand and accept and readability (ie, reading difficulty) that is suitable for patient education or understanding have been recommended to improve patient knowledge [9]. However, most health education materials are produced with inadequate attention to their suitability for the intended audience [10].
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41609
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
When previous studies assessed the suitability of health information across multiple sources, the converted percent was also applied to the present the quality of the health information per SAM criterion [47,48].
Interact J Med Res 2018;7(2):e10440
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS