e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)

Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework
Comprehensive evaluation
Real-world relevance
Assessment of contextual understanding and probabilistic reasoning
Complex to design
Resource intensive
Potential bias in test creation
Real-world applicability
Evidence-based evaluation
Objective benchmarking
Dependent on data quality
Historical bias
May not capture AI’sa potential for novel insights
Leverages human expertise
Valuable in complex cases
Incorporates ethical judgment
Subjective
Time-consuming
Potential for expert bias
Comprehensive evaluation from
JMIR AI 2024;3:e55957
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Reference 54: Guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mild and moderate depression: a benchmarkingbenchmarking
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e45136
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

How Health Care Organizations Approach Social Media Measurement: Qualitative Study
Three types of benchmarks were apparent in social media measurement: personal benchmarking, comparative benchmarking, and metric benchmarking.
At least one participant alluded to using personal benchmarks to track progress, evaluate performance, and determine areas for improvement. This study conceptualized personal benchmarking as using self-set targets to evaluate social media performance.
JMIR Form Res 2020;4(8):e18518
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Based on the results of this study, benchmarking D1 and D2 showed the following. Inserting the material seemed to be challenging for both UI designs in general. Therefore, the guiding material (manual and quick starting guide) and training should focus on this task. The lever of D1 seemed to result in lower mental workload. It has a more dominant appearance compared with D2, where the lever is integrated into the housing for protection in case of a fall.
JMIR Hum Factors 2020;7(2):e15581
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Benchmarking against the CTCS-SP, these scores therefore indicate a level of competency well above a 50% minimum standard. It should be noted that this assessment was completed following Phase 2 of the training, before the therapists’ pilot cases; this means they had further opportunities to practice and consolidate their skills in Phase 3.
All patients showed excellent adherence. Each patient completed all of the core treatment modules.
JMIR Form Res 2019;3(2):e13446
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section