This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Public Health (207) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (544) Information Quality in Digital Media (347)

Published on in Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Jan-Jun

Can Consumers Trust Web-Based Information About Celiac Disease? Accuracy, Comprehensiveness, Transparency, and Readability of Information on the Internet

Can Consumers Trust Web-Based Information About Celiac Disease? Accuracy, Comprehensiveness, Transparency, and Readability of Information on the Internet

Can Consumers Trust Web-Based Information About Celiac Disease? Accuracy, Comprehensiveness, Transparency, and Readability of Information on the Internet

Authors of this article:

Shawna L McNally1 ;   Michael C Donohue2 ;   Kimberly P Newton3 ;   Sandra P Ogletree4 ;   Kristen K Conner5 ;   Sarah E Ingegneri6 ;   Martin F Kagnoff1
Article Authors Cited by (35) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Lewi M, De Pelsmacker P, Cauberghe V. Women's information preferences, information needs and online interactive information portal engagement in a breast cancer early diagnosis context. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 2018;11(2):114 View
  2. Ciacci C, Ciclitira P, Hadjivassiliou M, Kaukinen K, Ludvigsson J, McGough N, Sanders D, Woodward J, Leonard J, Swift G. The gluten‐free diet and its current application in coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2015;3(2):121 View
  3. Sullivan T, Anderson J, Ahn U, Ahn N. Can Internet Information on Vertebroplasty be a Reliable Means of Patient Self-education?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2014;472(5):1597 View
  4. Ben-Mussa A, Paget A. Popular apps on the medical category targeting patients and the general public in the United Kingdom: Do they conform to the Health On the Net Foundation principles?. Health Informatics Journal 2018;24(3):259 View
  5. Rothrock S, Rothrock A, Swetland S, Pagane M, Isaak S, Romney J, Chavez V, Chavez S. Quality, Trustworthiness, Readability, and Accuracy of Medical Information Regarding Common Pediatric Emergency Medicine-Related Complaints on the Web. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019;57(4):469 View
  6. Al Sarkhy A. Social media usage pattern and its influencing factors among celiac patients and their families. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology 2020;26(2):99 View
  7. Ethan D, Meleo-Erwin Z, Fera J, Garcia P, Basch C. Readability of Online Information on Celiac Disease: A Brief Report. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2020;24(2):126 View
  8. Sjöström A, Hörnsten Å, Hajdarevic S, Emmoth A, Isaksson U. Primary Health Care Nurses’ Experiences of Consultations With Internet-Informed Patients: Qualitative Study. JMIR Nursing 2019;2(1):e14194 View
  9. Mehlman M. Why Physicians Are Fiduciaries For Their Patients. Indiana Health Law Review 2015;12(1):1 View
  10. Barnoy S, Melnikov S, Bar-Tal Y. The effect of e-health information on nurse-patient encounters: Mutual feelings and perceptions. Current Psychology 2020;39(4):1416 View
  11. Felipe L, Beukes E, Fox B, Manchaiah V. Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders. Journal of Vestibular Research 2020;30(2):63 View
  12. Gaesser G, Angadi S. Navigating the gluten-free boom. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants 2015;28(8):1 View
  13. See J, Kaukinen K, Makharia G, Gibson P, Murray J. Practical insights into gluten-free diets. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2015;12(10):580 View
  14. Sivakumar G, Mares M. The Doctor Versus the Internet: Effects of Low-, Medium-, and High-Quality Websites on Intentions to Follow the Doctor’s Advice. Health Communication 2017;32(12):1454 View
  15. Oxentenko A, Murray J. Celiac Disease: Ten Things That Every Gastroenterologist Should Know. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2015;13(8):1396 View
  16. Banti T, Fievet L, Fabre A. Gluten : l’information disponible sur Internet est-elle en accord avec les recommandations des sociétés savantes ?. Archives de Pédiatrie 2017;24(10):977 View
  17. Conesa-Fuentes M, Hernandez-Morante J. Prospective analysis of the quality of Spanish health information web sites after 3 years. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2016;41(4):417 View
  18. Wolf R, Lebwohl B, Lee A, Zybert P, Reilly N, Cadenhead J, Amengual C, Green P. Hypervigilance to a Gluten-Free Diet and Decreased Quality of Life in Teenagers and Adults with Celiac Disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2018;63(6):1438 View
  19. Buseck A, Lebwohl B, Green P. Quality and Content of Online Patient Resources for Celiac Disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2021;66(7):2209 View
  20. Arbuckle C, Tomaszewski D, Brown L, Schommer J, Morisky D, Parlett-Pelleriti C, Linstead E. Exploring the relationship of digital information sources and medication adherence. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2019;109:303 View
  21. Ludvigsson J, Card T, Ciclitira P, Swift G, Nasr I, Sanders D, Ciacci C. Support for patients with celiac disease: A literature review. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2015;3(2):146 View
  22. Geiger J, Rhee Y. Registered Dietitians' Preferred Celiac Disease Resources and Twitter, Facebook, Smartphone App, or Internet Use for Celiac Disease Patient Education. Topics in Clinical Nutrition 2017;32(3):211 View
  23. Sample D, Turner J. Improving gluten free diet adherence by youth with celiac disease. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 2021;33(5) View
  24. Pérez-Pérez M, Ferreira T, Igrejas G, Fdez-Riverola F. A deep learning relation extraction approach to support a biomedical semi-automatic curation task: The case of the gluten bibliome. Expert Systems with Applications 2022;195:116616 View
  25. Aspasia S, Emmanuela-Kalliopi K, Nikolaos T, Eirini S, Ioannis S, Anastasia M. The gluten-free diet challenge in adults with coeliac disease: the Hellenic survey. PEC Innovation 2022;1:100037 View
  26. Nangia D, Saini A, Krishnan A, Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Logani A. Quality and accuracy of patient‐oriented Web‐based information regarding tooth avulsion. Dental Traumatology 2022;38(4):299 View
  27. Germone M, Wright C, Kimmons R, Coburn S. Twitter Trends for Celiac Disease and the Gluten-Free Diet: Cross-sectional Descriptive Analysis. JMIR Infodemiology 2022;2(2):e37924 View
  28. Jaime C, Samuel L, Fera J, Basch C. Discussing health while seeking community: A descriptive study of celiac disease on TikTok. Nutrition and Health 2023;29(1):37 View
  29. Pérez-Pérez M, Ferreira T, Igrejas G, Fdez-Riverola F. A novel gluten knowledge base of potential biomedical and health-related interactions extracted from the literature: Using machine learning and graph analysis methodologies to reconstruct the bibliome. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2023;143:104398 View
  30. Denniss E, Lindberg R, McNaughton S. Quality and accuracy of online nutrition-related information: a systematic review of content analysis studies. Public Health Nutrition 2023;26(7):1345 View
  31. Twohig P, Walsh E, Trujillo S, Manatsathit W, Peeraphatdit T. Evaluating online patient education materials for liver cirrhosis. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2024;193(4):1799 View
  32. Grandinetti J. Gluten-free apps, disability, and travel: Developing a critical heuristic for the implementation of mobile apps. Mobile Media & Communication 2024 View
  33. Vázquez-Polo M, Navarro V, Larretxi I, Perez-Junkera G, Lasa A, Miranda J, Churruca I. Effectiveness of a nutrition education programme for individuals with celiac disease and their supporters through social media (GLUTLEARN project). Computers in Biology and Medicine 2025;184:109505 View