Published on in Vol 1, No 2 (2012): Jul-Dec

Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Telemedicine Service for the Treatment of Acute Stroke Patients: TeleStroke

Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Telemedicine Service for the Treatment of Acute Stroke Patients: TeleStroke

Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Telemedicine Service for the Treatment of Acute Stroke Patients: TeleStroke

Journals

  1. Bagot K, Moloczij N, Arthurson L, Hair C, Hancock S, Bladin C, Cadilhac D. Nurses’ Role in Implementing and Sustaining Acute Telemedicine: A Mixed‐Methods, Pre‐Post Design Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2020;52(1):34 View
  2. Hu W, Chien S, Ying P, Liu P, Su C, Tang C. Impact of CCL4 gene polymorphisms upon the progression of lung cancer in a Han Chinese cohort. Medicine 2020;99(3):e18906 View
  3. Singh R, Mathiassen L, Switzer J, Adams R. Assimilation of Web-Based Urgent Stroke Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Two Networks. JMIR Medical Informatics 2014;2(1):e6 View
  4. Lloréns R, Noé E, Colomer C, Alcañiz M. Effectiveness, Usability, and Cost-Benefit of a Virtual Reality–Based Telerehabilitation Program for Balance Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015;96(3):418 View
  5. Mong R, Tiah L, Wong M, Tan C. Improving telestroke treatment times through a quality improvement initiative in a Singapore emergency department. Singapore Medical Journal 2019;60(2):69 View
  6. Martínez-Salvador B, Marcos M. Supporting the Refinement of Clinical Process Models to Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models. Business & Information Systems Engineering 2016;58(5):355 View
  7. Montaner J, Jiménez-Hernández M, López-Barneo J. How to Unfasten the Spanish Stroke Belt? Andalusia Chooses Research. International Journal of Stroke 2014;9(7):946 View
  8. Leong B, Ni H, Tiah L, Tan C. The Challenge of Tightening Door-to-Needle Timings in a Telestroke Setting: An Emergency Medicine Driven Initiative. Cureus 2020 View
  9. Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Bahaadinbeigy K. The most used questionnaires for evaluating telemedicine services. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2021;21(1) View
  10. Sarkar P, Malik S, Laha S, Das S, Bunk S, Ray J, Chatterjee R, Saha A. Dysbiosis of Oral Microbiota During Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Development. Frontiers in Oncology 2021;11 View
  11. Garavand A, Aslani N, Nadri H, Abedini S, Dehghan S. Acceptance of telemedicine technology among physicians: A systematic review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2022;30:100943 View
  12. Brandão P, Lanzoni G, Pinto I. Gestão em rede no atendimento ao acidente vascular cerebral: revisão integrativa de literatura. Saúde e Sociedade 2023;32(suppl 2) View
  13. Kung L, Yan Y, Kung C. Exploring Telemedicine Usage Intention Using Technology Acceptance Model and Social Capital Theory. Healthcare 2024;12(13):1267 View
  14. Torres Zenteno A, Fernández F, Palomino-García A, Moniche F, Escudero I, Jiménez-Hernández M, Caballero A, Escobar-Rodriguez G, Parra C. Mobile platform for treatment of stroke: A case study of tele-assistance. Health Informatics Journal 2016;22(3):676 View
  15. Al-Emran M, Al-Qaysi N, Al-Sharafi M, Alhadawi H, Ansari H, Arpaci I, Ali N. Factors Shaping Physicians’ Adoption of Telemedicine: A Systematic Review, Proposed Framework, and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View