This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

e-Learning and Medical Education (696)

Published on in Vol 1, No 2 (2012): Jul-Dec

The Effectiveness of an Interactive 3-Dimensional Computer Graphics Model for Medical Education

The Effectiveness of an Interactive 3-Dimensional Computer Graphics Model for Medical Education

The Effectiveness of an Interactive 3-Dimensional Computer Graphics Model for Medical Education

Authors of this article:

Bayanmunkh Battulga1 ;   Takeshi Konishi1 ;   Yoko Tamura1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hiroki Moriguchi1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (57) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 2017;10(6):549 View
  2. Yammine K, Violato C. A meta‐analysis of the educational effectiveness of three‐dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 2015;8(6):525 View
  3. Triepels C, Smeets C, Notten K, Kruitwagen R, Futterer J, Vergeldt T, Van Kuijk S. Does three‐dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?. Clinical Anatomy 2020;33(1):25 View
  4. Wang C, Daniel B, Asil M, Khwaounjoo P, Cakmak Y. A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy. Scientific Reports 2020;10(1) View
  5. Steinberg V, Vakhidova L, Gabitova E. An Analysis of the Vocational-Educational Problematics for Substantiating Production Specialist Competencies. The Education and science journal 2019;21(1):59 View
  6. Bernard F, Richard P, Kahn A, Fournier H. Does 3D stereoscopy support anatomical education?. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2020;42(7):843 View
  7. Clunie L, Morris N, Joynes V, Pickering J. How comprehensive are research studies investigating the efficacy of technology‐enhanced learning resources in anatomy education? A systematic review. Anatomical Sciences Education 2018;11(3):303 View
  8. Lin W, Chou J, Charette J, Metz M, Harris B, Choi N. Creating virtual 3‐dimensional models for teaching pre‐clinical tooth preparation: Students’ usages and perceptions. European Journal of Dental Education 2018;22(3) View
  9. Narváez-Hernández E, Murillo-Rábago E. Herramientas de estudio utilizadas por alumnos de ciencias de la salud en la materia de Anatomía. Investigación en Educación Médica 2014;3(12):204 View
  10. Hasenstein T, Patel K, Moore J, Meyr A. Printed 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scanned Ankle Fractures as an Educational Instrument. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 2019;58(6):1081 View
  11. Hackett M, Proctor M. Three-Dimensional Display Technologies for Anatomical Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2016;25(4):641 View
  12. Ruthberg J, Tingle G, Tan L, Ulrey L, Simonson-Shick S, Enterline R, Eastman H, Mlakar J, Gotschall R, Henninger E, Griswold M, Wish-Baratz S. Mixed reality as a time-efficient alternative to cadaveric dissection. Medical Teacher 2020;42(8):896 View
  13. Downer T, Gray M, Andersen P. Three-Dimensional Technology: Evaluating the Use of Visualisation in Midwifery Education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2020;39:27 View
  14. Kim S, Chung K. Medical information service system based on human 3D anatomical model. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2015;74(20):8939 View
  15. Zhao J, Xu X, Jiang H, Ding Y. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Medical Education 2020;20(1) View
  16. Kato A, Ziegler A, Utsumi M, Ohno K, Takeichi T. Three-dimensional imaging of internal tooth structures: Applications in dental education. Journal of Oral Biosciences 2016;58(3):100 View
  17. Kockro R, Amaxopoulou C, Killeen T, Wagner W, Reisch R, Schwandt E, Gutenberg A, Giese A, Stofft E, Stadie A. Stereoscopic neuroanatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger 2015;201:91 View
  18. Mogali S, Yeong W, Tan H, Tan G, Abrahams P, Zary N, Low‐Beer N, Ferenczi M. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi‐material and multi‐colored three‐dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Anatomical Sciences Education 2018;11(1):54 View
  19. Nobuoka D, Fuji T, Yoshida K, Takagi K, Kuise T, Utsumi M, Yoshida R, Umeda Y, Shinoura S, Takeda Y, Ohtsuka A. Surgical education using a multi‐viewpoint and multi‐layer three‐dimensional atlas of surgical anatomy (with video). Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2014;21(8):556 View
  20. Birbara N, Sammut C, Pather N. Virtual Reality in Anatomy: A Pilot Study Evaluating Different Delivery Modalities. Anatomical Sciences Education 2020;13(4):445 View
  21. Kim C, Jung Y, Park J. The Visible Korean: movable surface models of the hip joint. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2021;43(4):559 View
  22. Bork F, Lehner A, Eck U, Navab N, Waschke J, Kugelmann D. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Augmented Reality in Gross Anatomy Teaching: A Quantitative and Qualitative Pilot Study. Anatomical Sciences Education 2021;14(5):590 View
  23. Chen S, Zhu J, Cheng C, Pan Z, Liu L, Du J, Shen X, Shen Z, Zhu H, Liu J, Yang H, Ma C, Pan H. Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model. BMC Medical Education 2020;20(1) View
  24. Arents V, de Groot P, Struben V, van Stralen K. Use of 360° virtual reality video in medical obstetrical education: a quasi-experimental design. BMC Medical Education 2021;21(1) View
  25. Olumuyiwa S, Akinsola M. Interactive E-Note and Problem-Solving Strategies Effects on Junior Secondary School Students’ Achievements in Mathematics, Kaduna-Nigeria. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education 2021;2(1):ep21008 View
  26. Li X, Dai X, Guo J, Qu Y, Wu B, Liu S, Wan D, Ai S. Application of 3D Printing and WebGL-Based 3D Visualisation Technology in Imaging Teaching of Ankle Joints. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) 2021;26(3):319 View
  27. Cheung C, Yang J, Tipoe G. Multifactorial learning challenges in anatomy: What is the niche in current research?. Anatomical Sciences Education 2021;14(6):856 View
  28. Sadeghi A, Mathari S, Abjigitova D, Maat A, Taverne Y, Bogers A, Mahtab E. Current and Future Applications of Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Cardiothoracic Surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2022;113(2):681 View
  29. Zilverschoon M, Custers E, ten Cate O, Kruitwagen C, Bleys R. Support for using a three‐dimensional anatomy application over anatomical atlases in a randomized comparison. Anatomical Sciences Education 2022;15(1):178 View
  30. Chickness J, Trautman-Buckley K, Evey K, Labranche L. Novel development of a 3D digital mediastinum model for anatomy education. Translational Research in Anatomy 2022;26:100158 View
  31. Hwang N, Shim S, Cheon H. Digital learning designs in occupational therapy education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education 2023;23(1) View
  32. Vandenbossche V, Valcke M, Willaert W, Audenaert E. From bones to bytes: Do manipulable 3D models have added value in osteology education compared to static images?. Medical Education 2023;57(4):359 View
  33. YOSHIZUKA H, SANO N, MITSUTAKE T, ASAMI T, KOSAKA K. Qualitative Study of the Educational Utility of a 3D Anatomical Education System for Undergraduate Education of Rehabilitation Professionals. Rigakuryoho Kagaku 2021;36(4):579 View
  34. Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P. Expanding the use of Computer-Based Assessments in Medical Education. Current Medical Issues 2022;20(1):44 View
  35. Tudor Car L, Kyaw B, Teo A, Fox T, Vimalesvaran S, Apfelbacher C, Kemp S, Chavannes N. Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review. JMIR Serious Games 2022;10(2):e29594 View
  36. Love T, Cysyk J, Attaluri A, Tunks R, Harter K, Sipos R. Examining Science and Technology/Engineering Educators’ Views of Teaching Biomedical Concepts Through Physical Computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2023;32(1):96 View
  37. Bhaskar N, Narayanan S, Prathap S. Effectiveness of Animation Videos as an Auxiliary Tool to Conventional Lectures for Teaching Paediatric Surgery – An Interventional Study, Kozhikode, Kerala. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare 2021;8(24):2094 View
  38. Kukulski J, Rausa J, Weld J, Jaji A, Ikeda N, Lee B, Thomas L, Anderson R, Loomba R. The utility of a structured, interactive cardiac anatomy teaching session for resident education. Cardiology in the Young 2023;33(2):208 View
  39. Kubanov A, Mahakova Y, Astakhova I. Virtual reality as a way to modernize Russian medical education. National Health Care (Russia) 2022;2(3):47 View
  40. Chwał J, Kostka P, Tkacz E. Assessment of the Extent of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using 3D Modeling Technology. Healthcare 2023;11(17):2441 View
  41. Chauhan P, Mehra S, Pandya A. The Impact of Virtual Interactive Three-Dimensional Model in the Conceptualization of the Anatomy of the Sacrum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus 2023 View
  42. Koutoulakis E, Marage L, Markodimitrakis E, Aubignac L, Jenny C, Bessieres I, Lalande A. Automatic Multiorgan Segmentation in Pelvic Region with Convolutional Neural Networks on 0.35 T MR-Linac Images. Algorithms 2023;16(11):521 View
  43. Cheung R, Yang J, Fang C, Leung M, Bridges S, Tipoe G. Show them what they can't see! An evaluation of the use of customized 3D printed models in head and neck anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 2024;17(2):379 View
  44. Eroğlu F, Erkan B, Koyuncu S, Komşal Z, Çiçek F, Ülker M, Toklu M, Atlan M, Kıyak Y, Kula S, Coşkun Ö, Budakoğlu I. Effectiveness of using 2D atlas and 3D PDF as a teaching tool in anatomy lectures in initial learners: a randomized controlled trial in a medical school. BMC Medical Education 2023;23(1) View
  45. Babaita A, Kako M, Teramoto C, Okamoto M, Hayashi Y, Ohshimo S, Sadamori T, Hattori M, Moriyama M. Face-to-face versus 360° VR video: a comparative study of two teaching methods in nursing education. BMC Nursing 2024;23(1) View
  46. Kayed J, Akl T, Massoud C, Margossian C, Fayad H, Fares G, Felefly T, Rihana S. Serious game for radiotherapy training. BMC Medical Education 2024;24(1) View
  47. Lee J, Susanto J, Lai S, Cheow P, Low L, Bello F. What Faculty and Students Value When Evaluating Human Digital Anatomy Platforms: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 2024;11 View
  48. Nakhoul G, Taliercio J, Bassil E, Arrigain S, Schold J, Wardrop R, O’Toole J, Nally J, Bierer S, Sedor J, Mehdi A. Virtual Nephron: Evaluation of a Novel Virtual Reality Educational Tool. Kidney International Reports 2024;9(9):2619 View
  49. Stouthandel M, Van Beek L, Van de Velde J, Vangestel C, Van Hoof T. A pilot study for the evaluation of 3D anatomy application ‘Complete Anatomy’ as an additional non‐mandatory study tool for the functional anatomy classes of first year physical therapy students. Anatomical Sciences Education 2024;17(6):1336 View
  50. Alturkustani S, Ryan S, O’Mahony S, Toulouse A, O'Mahony C, Lone M. Comparison of ‘Complete Anatomy’ (CA) to conventional methods for teaching laryngeal anatomy to first-year dental and dental hygiene students in Ireland. Translational Research in Anatomy 2024;37:100324 View
  51. Schirone R, Corte G, Ehlers J, Herre C, Schmedding M, Merle R, Pachtmann J, Bahramsoltani M. Effects of 3D Scans on Veterinary Students’ Learning Outcomes Compared to Traditional 2D Images in Anatomy Classes. Animals 2024;14(15):2171 View
  52. Pokojná H, Kozliková B, Furmanová K, Kriglstein S. ProjectAnatomy : a handy tool for learning forearm anatomy with augmented physicalisations. Behaviour & Information Technology 2024;43(14):3389 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Kim S, Chung K. IT Convergence and Security 2012. View
  2. Elmansouri A, Murray O, Hall S, Border S. Biomedical Visualisation. View
  3. Patra A, Pushpa N, Ravi K. Biomedical Visualisation. View