This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Sciences (146)

Published on in Vol 3, No 3 (2014): July-September

The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes

The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes

The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes

Authors of this article:

Michael C Pitter1 Author Orcid Image ;   Christopher Simmonds2 Author Orcid Image ;   Usha Seshadri-Kreaden3 Author Orcid Image ;   Helen B Hubert4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (41) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Janda M, Armfield N, Kerr G, Kurz S, Jackson G, Currie J, Page K, Weaver E, Yazdani A, Obermair A. Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women. Journal of Patient Experience 2020;7(3):372 View
  2. Byrnes J, Trabuco E. Evidence Basis for Hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2016;43(3):495 View
  3. Dave A, Yi J, Boothe A, Brashear H, Byrne J, Gad Y. Listening to the HysterSisters: A Retrospective Keyword Frequency Analysis of Conversations About Hysterectomy Recovery. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2019;2(2):e10728 View
  4. Truong M, Kim J, Scheib S, Patzkowsky K. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2016;28(4):304 View
  5. Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki M, Kim J, Milad M. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2015;22(6):1049 View
  6. Lirk P, Thiry J, Bonnet M, Joshi G, Bonnet F. Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019;44(4):425 View
  7. Fonseca M, Castro R, Machado M, Conte T, Girao M. Uterine Artery Embolization and Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis Followed by Indirect Treatment Comparison. Clinical Therapeutics 2017;39(7):1438 View
  8. Giuliani E, As‐Sanie S, Marsh E. Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2020;149(1):3 View
  9. Hokenstad E, Hallbeck M, Lowndes B, Morrow M, Weaver A, McGree M, Glaser G, Occhino J. Ergonomic Robotic Console Configuration in Gynecologic Surgery: An Interventional Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2021;28(4):850 View
  10. Radosa J, Radosa C, Mavrova R, Wagenpfeil S, Hamza A, Joukhadar R, Baum S, Karsten M, Juhasz-Boess I, Solomayer E, Radosa M, Robboy S. Postoperative Quality of Life and Sexual Function in Premenopausal Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Myomectomy for Symptomatic Fibroids: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. PLOS ONE 2016;11(11):e0166659 View
  11. Danilyants N, MacKoul P, van der Does L, Haworth L, Baxi R. A value-based evaluation of minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches. Gynecological Surgery 2019;16(1) View
  12. Park J, Son W, Kwak Y, Ohk B. Pterional versus superciliary keyhole approach: direct comparison of approach-related complaints and satisfaction in the same patient. Journal of Neurosurgery 2018;130(1):220 View
  13. Benson C, Thompson S, Li G, Asafu-Adjei D, Brandes S. Bladder and ureteral injuries during benign hysterectomy: an observational cohort analysis in New York State. World Journal of Urology 2020;38(8):2049 View
  14. Seo J, Lee I, Kim J, Chung J. The role of port site local anesthetic injection in laparoendoscopic single site surgery: a prospective randomized study. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2020;63(3):387 View
  15. Moloney R, O’Brien B, Coffey J, Coffey A, Murphy F. Patients' Perceptions After Robot‐Assisted Surgery: An Integrative Review. AORN Journal 2020;112(2):133 View
  16. Grundström H, Alehagen S, Berterö C, Kjølhede P. Impact of Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences of Benign Hysterectomy: A Study from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Journal of Women's Health 2018;27(5):691 View
  17. Ebner F, Friedl T, Scholz C, Schochter F, Janni W, Vorwerk E, deGregorio N. Is open surgery the solution to avoid morcellation of uterine sarcomas? A systematic literature review on the effect of tumor morcellation and surgical techniques. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2015;292(3):499 View
  18. Fortin C, Hur C, Falcone T. Impact of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy on Quality of Life. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2019;26(2):219 View
  19. Smith A, AlAshqar A, Chaves K, Borahay M. Association of demographic, clinical, and hospital‐related factors with use of robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: A national database study. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2020;16(4) View
  20. Dandolu V, Pathak P. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy. International Urogynecology Journal 2018;29(6):865 View
  21. Kiani S, Kurian D, Henkin S, Desai P, Brunel F, Poston R. Direct to consumer advertising of robotic heart bypass surgery. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 2016;10(4):358 View
  22. Madhvani K, Curnow T, Carpenter T. Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2019;126(6):795 View
  23. Björkström L, Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Kjølhede P. The Impact of Preoperative Assessment and Planning on the Outcome of Benign Hysterectomy – a Systematic Review. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2021;81(02):200 View
  24. Azadi S, Green I, Arnold A, Truong M, Potts J, Martino M. Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2021;28(3):490 View
  25. Claydon O, McCulloch J, Thorpe G, Kulkarni S, Delimpalta C, Dowsett D, Ward W, Stearns A, Hernon J, Kapur S, Shaikh I. Patient experiences of left-sided colorectal resection by robotic, conventional laparoscopic and open approaches: a qualitative study. Techniques in Coloproctology 2023;27(7):537 View
  26. Tummers F, Hoebink J, Driessen S, Jansen F, Twijnstra A. Decline in surgeon volume after successful implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: An undesired side effect?. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2021;100(11):2082 View
  27. Jeong S, Kim K, Ryu J, Cha J, Park S, Park S. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of Large Uterus with Gynecologic Benign Disease. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2022;12(12):2042 View
  28. Leon M, Carrubba A, DeStephano C, Heckman M, Craver E, Dinh T. Impact of robotic single and dual console systems in the training of minimally invasive gynecology surgery (MIGS) fellows. Journal of Robotic Surgery 2022;16(6):1273 View
  29. Oxley S, Xiong R, Wei X, Kalra A, Sideris M, Legood R, Manchanda R. Quality of Life after Risk-Reducing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review. Cancers 2022;14(23):5832 View
  30. Madhvani K, Fernandez‐Felix B, Zamora J, Carpenter T, Khan K. Personalising the risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open hysterectomy in benign conditions: Development and external validation of risk prediction models. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2022;129(7):1141 View
  31. Yang J, Fan X, Gao J, Li D, Xu Y, Chen G. Cost effectiveness analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in Western China: a societal perspective. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  32. Truong M, Tholemeier L. Role of Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2022;49(2):273 View
  33. Arip M, Yap V, Rajagopal M, Selvaraja M, Dharmendra K, Chinnapan S. Evidence-Based Management of Uterine Fibroids With Botanical Drugs-A Review. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022;13 View
  34. Breuer M, Wittenborn J, Rossaint R, Van Waesberghe J, Kowark A, Mathei D, Keszei A, Tchaikovski S, Zeppernick M, Zeppernick F, Stickeler E, Zoremba N, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Bruells C. Warm and humidified insufflation gas during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery reduces postoperative pain in predisposed patients—a randomized, controlled multi-arm trial. Surgical Endoscopy 2022;36(6):4154 View
  35. Rooma S, Rupa B, Reddy N. Single centre experience in India for benign gynecological robotic surgery with da Vinci Si system: A real world data analysis of one decade. Gynecologic Robotic Surgery 2023;4(1):14 View
  36. Fatkullin I, Fatkullina L, Bakanova A, Mulendeeva M. Uterine myoma and pregnancy. Issues of tactics and improvement of reproductive outcomes. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa 2023;23(6):135 View
  37. Incognito G, Gulino F, Cianci S, Occhipinti S, Incognito D, De Tommasi O, Genovese F, Palumbo M. Minimizing Blood Loss in Laparotomic Myomectomy through the Tourniquet Use: Insights from Our Clinical Experience and Literature Review. Surgeries 2024;5(2):162 View
  38. Evans R, Taylor A. Constant high-level visual acuity during total laparoscopic hysterectomy using the OpClear ® system. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2024;44(1) View
  39. Yagur Y, Martino M, Sarofim M, Almoqren M, Anderson H, Robertson J, Choi S, Rosen D, Chou D. Implementation and outcomes in benign gynecological surgery with HUGO™ RAS system 12 months initial experience. Journal of Robotic Surgery 2024;18(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Lenihan J. Handbook of Gynecology. View
  2. Lenihan J. Handbook of Gynecology. View