This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Quality in Digital Media (347) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (544)

Published on in Vol 4, No 1 (2015): Jan-Mar

Patients' Perspectives of Accessibility and Digital Delivery of Factual Content Provided by Official Medical and Surgical Specialty Society Websites: A Qualitative Assessment

Patients' Perspectives of Accessibility and Digital Delivery of Factual Content Provided by Official Medical and Surgical Specialty Society Websites: A Qualitative Assessment

Patients' Perspectives of Accessibility and Digital Delivery of Factual Content Provided by Official Medical and Surgical Specialty Society Websites: A Qualitative Assessment

Authors of this article:

Darren Ow1 Author Orcid Image ;   David Wetherell1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nathan Papa1 Author Orcid Image ;   Damien Bolton1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nathan Lawrentschuk1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Abuhadra N, Nazha A. Online and Social Media Resources for Patients with MDS. Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 2018;13(6):570 View
  2. Slatore C, Kulkarni H, Corn J, Sockrider M. Improving Health Literacy. The New American Thoracic Society Guidelines for Patient Education Materials. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2016;13(8):1208 View
  3. Alhuwail D, AlMeraj Z, Boujarwah F. Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2018;18(1) View
  4. Markham M, Gentile D, Graham D. Social Media for Networking, Professional Development, and Patient Engagement. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 2017;(37):782 View
  5. Okhovati M, Karami F, Khajouei R. Exploring the usability of the central library websites of medical sciences universities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2017;49(3):246 View
  6. Gianduzzo T, Gardiner R, Rashid P, Young R, Frydenberg M, Kelly S. Impact of branding on public awareness of healthcare-related governing bodies: a pilot study of the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand brand. BJU International 2016;118:23 View
  7. Steele S, Arshad S, Bush R, Dasani S, Cologne K, Bleier J, Raphaeli T, Kelz R. Social media is a necessary component of surgery practice. Surgery 2015;158(3):857 View
  8. Martins J, Gonçalves R, Branco F. A full scope web accessibility evaluation procedure proposal based on Iberian eHealth accessibility compliance. Computers in Human Behavior 2017;73:676 View
  9. M Barbara A, Dobbins M, Haynes R, Iorio A, Lavis J, Levinson A. User Experiences of the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal’s Evidence Summaries and Blog Posts: Usability Study. JMIR Human Factors 2016;3(2):e22 View
  10. Dobbins M, Watson S, Read K, Graham K, Yousefi Nooraie R, Levinson A. A Tool That Assesses the Evidence, Transparency, and Usability of Online Health Information: Development and Reliability Assessment. JMIR Aging 2018;1(1):e3 View
  11. Lobo S, Lucas C, Herbert J, Townsend M, Smith M, Kunkler E, Charlton K. Nutrition information in pregnancy: Where do women seek advice and has this changed over time?. Nutrition & Dietetics 2020;77(3):382 View
  12. German M, Eccleston J, Tamez D, Remington P, Lucey M. Internet Published Policies Regarding Liver Transplant Eligibility and Substance Use in United States Transplant Centers. Hepatology Communications 2020;4(11):1717 View
  13. Wagner A, Milzer M, Steindorf K, Kiermeier S, Schmidt M, Maatouk I. Cancer-related Fatigue: Quality, Credibility, Usability, and Readability of Information on Websites of Health Care Institutions in Germany. Patient Education and Counseling 2024:108135 View
  14. Craven B, Kaiser A, Blencowe L, Jervis-Rademeyer H, Boag L, Murphy W, Miyatani M. Bone health education in individuals with spinal cord injury or disease—the Bare Bones Podcast Series: plan it, produce it, post it!. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2024;5 View