Published on in Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Jan-Mar

Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home

Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home

Opinions and Beliefs About Telemedicine for Emergency Treatment During Ambulance Transportation and for Chronic Care at Home

Journals

  1. Metelmann C, Metelmann B, Kohnen D, Prasser C, Süss R, Kuntosch J, Scheer D, Laslo T, Fischer L, Hasebrook J, Flessa S, Hahnenkamp K, Brinkrolf P. Evaluation of a Rural Emergency Medical Service Project in Germany: Protocol for a Multimethod and Multiperspective Longitudinal Analysis. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(2):e14358 View
  2. Valenzuela Espinoza A, Devos S, van Hooff R, Fobelets M, Dupont A, Moens M, Hubloue I, Lauwaert D, Cornu P, Brouns R, Putman K. Time Gain Needed for In-Ambulance Telemedicine: Cost-Utility Model. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(11):e175 View
  3. Zhang Z, Brazil J, Ozkaynak M, Desanto K. Evaluative Research of Technologies for Prehospital Communication and Coordination: a Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Systems 2020;44(5) View
  4. Metelmann C, Metelmann B, Bartels J, Laslo T, Fleßa S, Hasebrook J, Hahnenkamp K, Brinkrolf P. Was erwarten Mitarbeiter der Notfallmedizin vom Telenotarzt?. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 2019;22(6):492 View
  5. Stănescu A, Gordon P, Copotoiu S, Boeriu C. Moving Toward a Universal Digital Era in Mass Casualty Incidents and Disasters: Emergency Personnel's Perspective in Romania. Telemedicine and e-Health 2018;24(4):283 View
  6. Koskimies E, Koskinen S, Leino‐Kilpi H, Suhonen R. The informational privacy of patients in prehospital emergency care—Integrative literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2020;29(23-24):4440 View
  7. Ariens L, Schussler-Raymakers F, Frima C, Flinterman A, Hamminga E, Arents B, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, de Bruin-Weller M, van Os-Medendorp H. Barriers and Facilitators to eHealth Use in Daily Practice: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals in Dermatology. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(9):e300 View
  8. Kim Y, Groombridge C, Romero L, Clare S, Fitzgerald M. Decision Support Capabilities of Telemedicine in Emergency Prehospital Care: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e18959 View
  9. Wang J, Fu Y, Lou V, Tan S, Chui E. A systematic review of factors influencing attitudes towards and intention to use the long-distance caregiving technologies for older adults. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2021;153:104536 View
  10. Pedrotti C, Accorsi T, Amicis Lima K, Filho J, Morbeck R, Cordioli E, Pietrantonio F. Cross-sectional study of the ambulance transport between healthcare facilities with medical support via telemedicine: Easy, effective, and safe tool. PLOS ONE 2021;16(9):e0257801 View
  11. Thiel B, Iao I, Smid J, de Wit E, Koopman S, Geerts B, Godfried M, Kalkman C. Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(2):e33706 View
  12. Culmer N, Smith T, Stager C, Meyer H, Quick S, Grimm K. Evaluation of the triple aim of medicine in prehospital telemedicine: A systematic literature review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2020;26(10):571 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Metelmann B, Metelmann C. Mobile Health Applications for Quality Healthcare Delivery. View