This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Quality in Digital Media (341)

Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Apr-Jun

Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures

Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures

Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures

Authors of this article:

Muzammil Memon1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lydia Ginsberg2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicole Simunovic3 Author Orcid Image ;   Bill Ristevski4 Author Orcid Image ;   Mohit Bhandari3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ydo Vincent Kleinlugtenbelt4, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Poon J, Gjorgjievski M, Moga I, Ristevski B. Quality and Accuracy of Information Available on Websites for Distracted Driving: Qualitative Analysis. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2019;8(4):e16154 View
  2. Claudio C, Dizon Z, October T. Evaluating Palliative Care Resources Available to the Public Using the Internet and Social Media. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® 2018;35(9):1174 View
  3. Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure. Advances in Preventive Medicine 2017;2017:1 View
  4. Rothrock S, Rothrock A, Swetland S, Pagane M, Isaak S, Romney J, Chavez V, Chavez S. Quality, Trustworthiness, Readability, and Accuracy of Medical Information Regarding Common Pediatric Emergency Medicine-Related Complaints on the Web. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019;57(4):469 View
  5. Shah A, Ali M, Qayyum A, Begum A, Han H, Ariza-Montes A, Araya-Castillo L. Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients’ Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(19):9969 View
  6. Shan Y, Xing Z, Dong Z, Ji M, Wang D, Cao X. Translating and Adapting the DISCERN Instrument Into a Simplified Chinese Version and Validating Its Reliability: Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e40733 View
  7. Reddy R, Golan R, Loloi J, Diaz P, Saltzman R, Watane A, Ramasamy R. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction. Andrologia 2022;54(11) View
  8. Nangia D, Saini A, Krishnan A, Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Logani A. Quality and accuracy of patient‐oriented Web‐based information regarding tooth avulsion. Dental Traumatology 2022;38(4):299 View
  9. YÜCEL K. Ülkemizde İngilizce Tıp Eğitiminde Kullanılan Nöroanatomi Kitaplarının ve Wikipedia’daki Nöroanatomi Sayfalarının Okunabilirliği. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal 2022;5(1):138 View
  10. Shah A, Muhammad W, Lee K, Naqvi R. Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients’ Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11226 View
  11. GÜLTEKİN M, DİNÇEL Y, DOĞAR F, ARSLAN S. Have the online patient information materials on biceps tendon disorders adequate, quality and readability?. Acta Medica Alanya 2023;7(1):46 View
  12. Poudel A, Adhikari A, Poudel S, Poudel A. Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Liver Transplantation in the United States. Transplantology 2024;5(3):216 View
  13. Ghalavand H, Nabiolahi A. Exploring online health information quality criteria on social media: a mixed method approach. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View