Published on in Vol 5, No 4 (2016): Oct-Dec

Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality

Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality

Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality

Journals

  1. Yokota R, Okuhara T, Ueno H, Okada H, Furukawa E, Kiuchi T. Online Japanese-Language Information on Lifestyle Factors Associated With Reduced Fertility: Content Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e19777 View
  2. Cisu T, Mingin G, Baskin L. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias. Journal of Pediatric Urology 2019;15(1):40.e1 View
  3. Dueppen A, Bellon-Harn M, Manchaiah V. Suitability of English Language Internet-Based Information for Voice Disorders. Journal of Voice 2020;34(6):962.e1 View
  4. Monton O, Lambert S, Belzile E, Mohr-Elzeki D. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, quality, and usefulness of online resources for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(10):1892 View
  5. Lee M, Shin C, An K. Trustworthiness, Readability, and Suitability of Web-Based Information for Stroke Prevention and Self-Management for Korean Americans: Critical Evaluation. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2018;7(2):e10440 View
  6. Sykes S, Wills J, Frings D, Church S, Wood K. Multidimensional eHealth Literacy for Infertility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(3):966 View
  7. Meppelink C, van Weert J, Brosius A, Smit E. Dutch health websites and their ability to inform people with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(11):2012 View
  8. Shen S, Zelkowitz P, Rosberger Z. Cancer and fertility: optimizing communication between patients and healthcare providers. Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care 2019;13(1):53 View
  9. Speller B, Micic S, Daly C, Pi L, Little T, Baxter N. Oncofertility Decision Support Resources for Women of Reproductive Age: Systematic Review. JMIR Cancer 2019;5(1):e12593 View
  10. Wang F, Wang Z, Sun W, Yang X, Bian Z, Shen L, Pan W, Liu P, Chen X, Fu L, Zhang F, Luo D. Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(5):e14826 View
  11. Kedzior S, Bianco-Miotto T, Breen J, Diener K, Donnelley M, Dunning K, Penno M, Schjenken J, Sharkey D, Hodyl N, Fullston T, Gardiner M, Brown H, Rumbold A. It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 2019;9:48 View
  12. Aguirre P, Coelho M, Rios D, Machado M, Cruvinel A, Cruvinel T. Evaluating the Dental Caries-Related Information on Brazilian Websites: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(12):e415 View
  13. Rathod P, Ould Brahim L, Belzile E, Lambert S. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(5):952 View
  14. Brochu F, Robins S, Miner S, Grunberg P, Chan P, Lo K, Holzer H, Mahutte N, Ouhilal S, Tulandi T, Zelkowitz P. Searching the Internet for Infertility Information: A Survey of Patient Needs and Preferences. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(12):e15132 View
  15. Cartwright A, Karunaratne M, Barr-Walker J, Johns N, Upadhyay U. Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e186 View
  16. Xie W, Ji M, Liu Y, Hao T, Chow C. Predicting Writing Styles of Online Materials for Children’s Health Education Using Machine-Learning Assisted Selection of Semantic Features (Preprint). JMIR Medical Informatics 2021 View
  17. Sun W, Luo A, Bian Z, Zhao B, Liu P, Wang K, Liu Y, Xie W, Wang F. Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information About Breast Cancer from Chinese Language Websites: Quality Assessment Survey. JMIR Cancer 2021;7(4):e25783 View
  18. Barron M, Lithgow D, Wade G, Mueller Luckey G. Fertility Health Knowledge in U.S. Adults: Men Narrowing the Knowledge Gap. American Journal of Men's Health 2022;16(5):155798832211179 View
  19. Shan Y, Xing Z, Dong Z, Ji M, Wang D, Cao X. Translating and Adapting the DISCERN Instrument Into a Simplified Chinese Version and Validating Its Reliability: Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e40733 View
  20. McCreavy C, Piccoli E, Krier S, Felter E, van Panhuis W. Readability, Suitability, and Content Evaluation of Initial, Online Masking Guidance from U.S. States during the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Health Education 2021;52(6):377 View
  21. Shabto J, Patil D, Poulose K, Bennett M, Xiao A, Hipp H, Kawwass J, Mehta A. Access to Care for Infertile Men: Referral Patterns of Fertility Clinics in the United States. Urology 2022;166:152 View
  22. Kruglova K, O'Connell S, Dawadi S, Gelgoot E, Miner S, Robins S, Schinazi J, Zelkowitz P. An mHealth App to Support Fertility Patients Navigating the World of Infertility (Infotility): Development and Usability Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(10):e28136 View
  23. Gelgoot E, Kruglova K, Chan P, Lo K, Rosberger Z, Chown P, Kazdan J, O’Connell S, Zelkowitz P. Evaluation of a Mobile Health App Offering Fertility Information to Male Patients With Cancer: Usability Study. JMIR Cancer 2022;8(2):e33594 View
  24. Miner S, Gelgoot E, Lahuec A, Wunderlich S, Safo D, Brochu F, Dawadi S, Robins S, Bernadette S, O’Connell L, Chan P, Ells C, Holzer H, Lo K, Mahutte N, Ouhilal S, Rosberger Z, Tulandi T, Zelkowitz P. “Who needs an app? Fertility patients’ use of a novel mobile health app”. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211022 View
  25. Plambeck B, Jiang J, Perez J, Wordekemper B, Fu D, Colvin A, Deibert C. Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient. Cureus 2023 View
  26. Ahmadzadeh K, Bahrami M, Zare‐Farashbandi F, Adibi P, Boroumand M, Rahimi A. Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2023;40(1):3 View
  27. Narvaez-Rojas A, Arnaout M, Hoz S, Agrawal A, Lee A, Moscote-Salazar L, Deora H. Info-pollution: a word of caution for the neurosurgical community. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery 2022;37(1) View
  28. Westerbotn M, Sormunen T. Male Infertility Information on Swedish Fertility Clinics’ Websites: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2023;27(1):53 View
  29. Asazawa K, Jitsuzaki M, Mori A, Ichikawa T. Effectiveness of a web‐based partnership support program for preventing decline in the quality of life of male patients undergoing infertility treatment: A quasi‐experimental study. Japan Journal of Nursing Science 2023;20(3) View
  30. Gil M, Kim S, Kim D, Kim S. Online coaching blended couple‐oriented intervention for preventing depression among Korean middle adulthood: A feasibility study. Family Process 2023;62(4):1478 View
  31. Yokota R, Okuhara T, Okada H, Furukawa E, Kiuchi T. Japanese Magazine Articles on Lifestyle Factors Associated with Fertility: A Content Analysis. Women 2023;3(3):408 View
  32. Aboalshamat K. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study. BMC Oral Health 2023;23(1) View
  33. Shan Y, Ji M, Xing Z, Dong Z, Wang D, Cao X. The Simplified Chinese Version of the Suitability Assessment of Materials for the Evaluation of Health-Related Information for Adults: Translation and Validation Study. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e41609 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Elahi E, Maqueda A, Lara J. Data Science and Algorithms in Systems. View
  2. Hoffmann M, Schwarz C, Gallé F, Schoberer D, Jabinger E, Voithofer C, Sendlhofer G. Patienten und Angehörige richtig informieren. View