This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (226) Cost-Effectiveness and Economics (252)

Published on in Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Jan-Mar

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13355, first published .
Web Comparison of Three Contingent Valuation Techniques in Women of Childbearing Age: The Case of Ovulation Induction in Quebec

Web Comparison of Three Contingent Valuation Techniques in Women of Childbearing Age: The Case of Ovulation Induction in Quebec

Web Comparison of Three Contingent Valuation Techniques in Women of Childbearing Age: The Case of Ovulation Induction in Quebec

Authors of this article:

Aissata Dieng1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jie He1 Author Orcid Image ;   Thomas G Poder2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Skedgel C, Ralphs E, Finn E, Whitty J, Markert M, Samuelsen C. Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey. BMJ Open 2021;11(3):e044986 View
  2. Díez-Gutiérrez M, Babri S. Tourists' perceptions of economic instruments as sustainable policies in protected areas: The case of Geiranger fjord in Norway. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 2022;39:100526 View
  3. Steigenberger C, Flatscher-Thoeni M, Siebert U, Leiter A. Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies. The European Journal of Health Economics 2022;23(9):1455 View
  4. Fenwick E, Eze A, D'Hooghe T, Pandey S, Chaudhari V, Ostawal A, Luyten J, Harty G. The value of treatment for infertility: A systematic literature review of willingness-to-pay thresholds and approaches for determining the cost effectiveness of fertility therapies. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2023;89:102340 View