This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Short Paper (3) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2748) Clinical Informatics (904) Demographics of Users, Social & Digital Divide (678)

Published on in Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Jan-Jun

Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Patients’ Ease of Use of a Touch-Screen (iPad) Patient Survey?

Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Patients’ Ease of Use of a Touch-Screen (iPad) Patient Survey?

Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Patients’ Ease of Use of a Touch-Screen (iPad) Patient Survey?

Authors of this article:

Saman Zarghom1 ;   David Di Fonzo2 ;   Fok-Han Leung3
Article Authors Cited by (24) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Dadaczynski K. Nutzung und User Experience einer gamifizierten Webanwendung zur Förderung der körperlichen Aktivität im betrieblichen Setting. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2018;13(4):312 View
  2. Liu L, Miguel Cruz A, Rios Rincon A, Buttar V, Ranson Q, Goertzen D. What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disability and Rehabilitation 2015;37(5):447 View
  3. Logsdon M, Davis D, Eckert D, Smith F, Stikes R, Rushton J, Myers J, Capps J, Sparks K. Feasibility of Two Educational Methods for Teaching New Mothers: A Pilot Study. interactive Journal of Medical Research 2015;4(4):e20 View
  4. Patel V, Hale T, Palakodeti S, Kvedar J, Jethwani K. Prescription Tablets in the Digital Age: A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Patient and Physician Attitudes Toward the Use of Tablets for Clinic-Based Personalized Health Care Information Exchange. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(4):e116 View
  5. Suzuki E, Mackenzie L, Sanson-Fisher R, Carey M, D’Este C, Asada H, Toi M. Acceptability of a Touch Screen Tablet Psychosocial Survey Administered to Radiation Therapy Patients in Japan. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2016;23(4):485 View
  6. Kim J, Kim B, Kang I, Kye M, Kim J, Kim J, Yoon S, Lyoo I, Lim S. Using a Tablet Device to Compensate for Underestimation of Cognitive Function due to Impaired Dominant Hand Function in Stroke Patients. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2017;33(5):423 View
  7. Newell S, Logan H, Guo Y, Marks J, Shepperd J. Evaluating Tablet Computers as a Survey Tool in Rural Communities. The Journal of Rural Health 2015;31(1):108 View
  8. Payne M, Janzen S, Earl E, Deathe B, Viana R. Feasibility testing of smart tablet questionnaires compared to paper questionnaires in an amputee rehabilitation clinic. Prosthetics & Orthotics International 2017;41(4):420 View
  9. Hans P, Gray C, Gill A, Tiessen J. The provider perspective: investigating the effect of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal on primary care provider workflow. Primary Health Care Research & Development 2018;19(02):151 View
  10. Pons-Fuster E, Ruiz Roca J, Tvarijonaviciute A, López-Jornet P. YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare. Odontology 2020;108(1):84 View
  11. Burford S, Park S, Dawda P. Small Data and Its Visualization for Diabetes Self-Management: Qualitative Study. JMIR Diabetes 2019;4(3):e10324 View
  12. Kouri A, Yamada J, Sale J, Straus S, Gupta S. Primary Care Pre-Visit Electronic Patient Questionnaire for Asthma: Uptake Analysis and Predictor Modeling. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e19358 View
  13. Turney B, Reynard J. Obtaining patient feedback in an outpatient lithotripsy service is facilitated by use of a touch-screen tablet (iPad™) survey. Urolithiasis 2014;42(4):317 View
  14. Carter M, Davey A, Wright C, Elmore N, Newbould J, Roland M, Campbell J, Burt J. Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care. British Journal of General Practice 2016;66(652):e786 View
  15. Perry B, Geoghegan C, Lin L, McGuire F, Nido V, Grabert B, Morin S, Hallinan Z, Corneli A. Patient preferences for using mobile technologies in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2019;15:100399 View
  16. Werkkala C, Bäckmand H, Kuosmanen L, Vastamäki M, Rajala T, Lindqvist P, Jylhä P. Efficacy of a real-time patient feedback system: patient satisfaction study in psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2020;74(2):155 View
  17. Geoghegan C, Nido V, Bemden A, Hallinan Z, Jordan L, Kehoe L, Morin S, Niskar A, Okubagzi P, Wood W. Learning from patient and site perspectives to develop better digital health trials: Recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2020;19:100636 View
  18. Johnson N, Kypri K, Attia J. Development of an Electronic Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Program for Hospital Outpatients With Unhealthy Alcohol Use. JMIR Research Protocols 2013;2(2):e36 View
  19. Lewinski A, Vaughn J, Diane A, Barnes A, Crowley M, Steinberg D, Stevenson J, Yang Q, Vorderstrasse A, Hatch D, Jiang M, Shaw R. Perceptions of Using Multiple Mobile Health Devices to Support Self‐Management Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2021;53(5):643 View
  20. Richter J, Chehab G, Schwartz C, Ricken E, Tomczak M, Acar H, Gappa H, Velasco C, Rosengren P, Povilionis A, Schneider M, Thestrup J. The PICASO cloud platform for improved holistic care in rheumatoid arthritis treatment—experiences of patients and clinicians. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2021;23(1) View
  21. Richter J, Weiß A, Bungartz C, Fischer-Betz R, Zink A, Schneider M, Strangfeld A. Mobile Responsive App—A Useful Additional Tool for Data Collection in the German Pregnancy Register Rhekiss?. Frontiers in Medicine 2021;8 View
  22. Markwardt H, Taghavi S, Williams A, Olivares M, McDuffee P, Hall B. Tablet Versus Quick Response Code: Difference in Research Participation Rates?. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2023;8(2):178 View
  23. Huang C, Alimu Y, Yang S, Kang S. What you think is a joke is actually cyberbullying: The effects of ethical dissonance, event judgment and humor style on cyberbullying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 2023;142:107670 View
  24. Khokhlov A, Andreenkova A, Dmitrieva E, Ilyin M, Lileeva E, Chizhov P, Miroshnikov A, Pozdnyakov N. Socio-Psychological Aspects of Introducing Mobile Technologies into Clinical Trials. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences 2023;78(3):194 View